【摘要】 《刑事审判参考》第1328号案例论及的法理问题值得进一步研究。虚假信息类犯罪的成立要求达到严重扰乱社会秩序的程度。“比照标准说”的实践意义并不明确，且缺乏直接关联性。“抽象危险犯说”与我国司法解释及刑法基础理论存在矛盾，有矫枉过正之嫌。三个虚假信息类罪名的传播对象和行为模式有极大交叉，可以类比适用严重扰乱社会秩序的判断标准。应当采用“现实社会秩序混乱说”的观点,并把握好“严重性”和“社会性”来综合分析。更多还原

【Abstract】 Reference to Criminal Trial case No. 1328 is reasonable, but at the same time, it also needs to further clarify the legal issues reflected behind it. The crime of disseminating false information requires a serious disturbance of social order. The practical significance of the “comparative standard theory” is not clear and lacks direct relevance. The “abstract dangerous offense theory” is in contradiction with the judicial interpretation and the basic theory of criminal law, and it is suspected of overcorrecting. The dissemination objects and behavior patterns of the crime of disseminating false information are extremely overlapped, so the judgment standard can be applied by analogy. We should adopt the “realistic social order chaos theory” and grasp the two key points of “seriousness” and “sociality”. We should comprehensively analyze whether it constitutes a serious disturbance of social order.更多还原