【摘要】 近年来，性别维度作为分析框架被广泛运用到日军“慰安妇”问题及战争性暴力研究中，由此带动研究方法及视角的转移，并促进研究领域的拓展及研究的深入和细化。但一些研究也出现对性别维度的过度依赖或盲目迷信，如以性别史代替政治史，提出超越国家与民族立场，以及由此导致的模糊甚至否认“慰安妇”制度实质等非历史主义倾向。“慰安妇”问题有其复杂性和特殊性，它既是性别史的研究对象，更是政治史研究的范畴，在使用性别维度时需要厘清其研究的限界，并保持应有的警惕。更多还原

【Abstract】 In recent years,scholars have widely adopted gender as a perspective through which to frame the study of the “comfort women ” in the Japanese army within war-related sexual violence. This change induces a paradigmatic shift and further extends the scope and depth of scholarly inquiry. However,there is also an overreliance upon or blind trust in the gender approach. As a result,some have replaced political history with gender history,proposing a position of transcending state/nation,and resulting in a historical nihilist tendency of challenging or even denying the brutal nature of the“comfort women”system. The“comfort women”question is complex and particular. It is not only a research subject in gender history,but also a topic in political history.When using the gender perspective,we need to be aware of its limits and to maintain a sharp sense of vigilance.更多还原