【摘要】 在“谁排放、谁监测”的污染源自行监测制度下，污染源自动监测数据的电子数据属性和由相对人提供的特殊性，使得其在行政执法中的运用方式不甚明确。目前，地方对自动监测数据的运用规定存在出入，司法实践中的认定方法也不尽相同。为统一并加强污染源自动监测数据在环境执法中的运用，在证据能力方面，应在缩限真实性、关联性、合法性要求的基础上，明确其证据能力的获得条件及瑕疵补正情形；在证明力方面，应在坚持自动监测数据不得单独定案的一般原则下增设例外情形，并指明证据链构成的应然模式。如此，才可最大程度发挥自动监测数据的实际效用。更多还原

【Abstract】 Since automatic monitoring data are electronic data provided by the pollutants themselves,its application in administrative activities is unclear.At present,there are discrepancies in local regulations regarding the application of automatic monitoring data,and the identification methods in judicial practice are also different. In order to unify and increase its application,the condition for acquiring probative force and the situation of correcting defects should be clarified on the basis of limiting the requirements of authenticity,relevance and legality. In terms of probative force,exceptional cases should be added on the premise that automatic monitoring data should be spared from making a separate decision,and the pattern of proof chain should be indicated as well. In this way,the practical utility of automatic monitoring data can be maximized.更多还原