节点文献

新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间隔离者心理状况调查及心理干预效果评价

Investigation on psychological status of the quarantined persons during the COVID-19 epidemic and evaluation of psychological intervention effect

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 郭赛玲吴树跃郑闻华高镇松杜浩然张婷

【Author】 Guo Sailing;Wu Shuyue;Zheng Wenhua;Gao Zhensong;Du Haoran;Zhang Ting;The Forth People’s Hospital of Shantou;

【机构】 汕头市第四人民医院

【摘要】 目的 调查新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间隔离者的心理状况,评价心理干预的效果。方法 将87名隔离者设为隔离组,94名普通群众设为普通组,将隔离组按是否愿意接受心理干预分为干预组66名,对照组21名。干预前比较隔离组与普通组症状自评量表、阿森斯失眠量表、斯坦福急性应激反应问卷、焦虑自评量表、抑郁自评量表评分。干预前后比较干预组与对照组症状自评量表、阿森斯失眠量表、斯坦福急性应激反应问卷、焦虑自评量表及抑郁自评量表评分。结果 干预前隔离组症状自评量表、阿森斯失眠量表、斯坦福急性应激反应问卷、焦虑自评量表、抑郁自评量表评分均显著高于普通组(P<0.01)。干预后干预组阿森斯失眠量表、焦虑自评量表评分均较干预前显著降低(P<0.05或0.01),对照组各量表评分与干预前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),干预后两组间各量表评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 新型冠状病毒肺炎隔离者心理问题较普通人群更严重,分层心理干预可以缓解隔离者的负性情绪,充分说明了心理救援队伍的组建在重大危机事件中的迫切性和必要性。

【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the psychological status of the quarantined persons during the COVID-19 epidemic, and to evaluate the effect of psychological intervention. Methods A total of 87 quarantined persons were set as the quarantine group, and 94 ordinary people were set as the ordinary group. The quarantine group was divided into intervention group and control group according to whether they were willing to accept psychological intervention. Before the intervention, the scores of symptom check list 90(SCL-90), Athens insomnia scale(AIS), Stanford acute stress reaction questionnaire(SASRQ), self-rating anxiety scale(SAS), and self-rating depression scale(SDS) were compared between the quarantine group and the ordinary group. Before and after the intervention, the SCL-90, AIS, SASRQ, SAS and SDS scores of the intervention group and the control group were compared. Results Before the intervention, the scores of SCL-90, AIS, SASRQ, SAS and SDS in the quarantine group were significantly higher than those in the ordinary group(P<0.01). After the intervention, the AIS and SAS scores of the intervention group were significantly lower than those before the intervention(P<0.05 or 0.01). There was no significant difference in the scores of each scale between the control group and before intervention(P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the scores of each scale between the two groups after intervention(P>0.05). Conclusions The psychological problems of the quarantined persons with COVID-19 are more serious than that of the general population. Stratified psychological intervention can alleviate the negative emotions of the quarantined persons, which fully demonstrates the urgency and necessity of the establishment of psychological rescue team in major crisis events.

  • 【文献出处】 临床心身疾病杂志 ,Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases , 编辑部邮箱 ,2022年05期
  • 【分类号】R395.6
  • 【下载频次】464
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络