【摘要】 【目的】对影响开放式同行评议实践的相关因素进行实证研究，发掘开放式同行评议的关键影响因素。【方法】以Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)中开放式同行评议期刊为研究对象，通过网络爬取相关数据。采用变量分类赋值的方式，对影响开放式同行评议的相关定性因素进行量化分析。采用多重对应分析图展示开放式同行评议相关影响因素及其不同类别的内在关联；采用最优尺度回归模型揭示相关影响因素对开放评议类型的影响程度。【结果】开放评议类型与评议专家身份的公开类别具有极密切的关联，评议专家身份对开放评议类型有显著正向影响，且重要性程度值非常高。【结论】评议专家身份是否公开成为开放式同行评议实践模式的关键影响因素，透明性同行评议是当前开放评议行之有效的实践模式。更多还原

【Abstract】 [Purposes] This paper makes an empirical study on the relevant factors affecting the practice of open peer review so as to verify the key influencing factors of open peer review. [Methods] We selected the open peer review journals in Directory of Open Access Journals(DOAJ) as the research objects, and fetched their relevant data from internet by web crawling. Using variable classification and assignment, we qualitatively analyzed the relevant factors affecting open peer review. A multiscale analysis chart was used to illustrate the influencing factors on open peer review as well as to visualize the internal correlations of them in different categories. The optimal scale regression model was used to reveal the influence of the factors in open peer review. [Findings] Open peer review is closely related to the open category of peer review expert identity. The peer review expert identity has a both positive and significant impact on open peer review, and the degree of correlation is very high. [Conclusions] Whether the identity of open peer reviewer is made public or not has become the most important factor affecting the practice modes of open peer review. Transparent peer review is an important and effective practice mode of open peer review.更多还原