【摘要】 目的 比较PBL教学法联合循证医学模式与传统教学法在神经外科住院医师规范化培训的效果。方法 随机从2019年1月—2020年1月在重庆医科大学附属第一医院神经外科参加住院医师规范化培训的学员中抽取40名作为研究对象，将其分为传统组和联合组，每组20名。传统组按传统模式授课，联合组接受PBL联合循证医学模式授课，比较两组的教学效果和授课满意度。结果传统组的理论考试平均成绩（77.35±6.52）分低于联合组（83.25±3.09）分，差异有统计学意义（P <0.05）。此外，两组学员在学习兴趣、临床思维能力的比较结果显示，联合组的授课效果明显优于传统组（P <0.05），但两组学员对教师授课满意度组间差异无统计学意义（P> 0.05）。结论 与传统教学法相比，PBL教学法联合循证医学模式能够提高神经外科住院医师规范化培训的效果。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To compare the effect of PBL combined with evidence-based medicine model and traditional teaching method in the standardized training of neurosurgery residents. Methods A total of 40 students of the standardized training for residents from neurosurgery department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2019 to January 2020were randomly selected as the research subjects and divided into the traditional group and the combined group, with 20 patients in each group. The traditional group received traditional instruction, while the combined group received PBL combined evidence-based medicine instruction. The teaching effects and teaching satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Results The average score(77.35±6.52)points of the theory test in the unified group was lower than that in the combined group(83.25±3.09) points, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). In addition,the comparison results of learning interest and clinical thinking ability between the two groups showed that the teaching effect of the combined group was significantly better than that of the traditional group(P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in teachers’ teaching satisfaction(P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional teaching method, PBL combined with evidence-based medicine method can improve the quality of standardized training for neurosurgery residents.更多还原