【摘要】 高校科研奖励政策，是一种以“贤能主义”“绩效主义”为价值导向，以行政逻辑为主导的非制度化物质奖励政策。随着破“五唯”、高等教育评价改革深入推进，实践层面如何破解高校科研“奖”与“不奖”及“如何奖”的困境，已成为不可回避、亟待研究和解决的系统性问题。它实际是高校科研“量化奖励”与激励原创性成果“质量、贡献和影响”微观实现机制的矛盾困境；是在政府机构、高校组织及个人等多重行为主体利益相关者博弈，行政逻辑与学术逻辑相互嵌套的矛盾运动过程中形成的。其具体表现形式为理性经济人与学术人的矛盾、量化公平与科研创新本质等“奖”与“不奖”的矛盾，以及科研奖励目标与技术实现手段等“如何奖”的矛盾。破解之道需要在多重逻辑、不同主体中寻求平衡点；转换认知和决策方式，以完善高校薪酬制度改革为突破口，分类推进高校科研奖励政策的治理。更多还原

【Abstract】 The scientific research reward policy of universities is a kind of non-institutionalized material reward policy which is value-oriented with "meritocracy" and "performance doctrine" and dominated by administrative logic. With the breaking of the "five only" and the deepening of higher education evaluation reform, at the practical level, how to solve the dilemma of "award", "no award" and "how to award" in university scientific research has become an unavoidable systematic problem that needs to be studied and solved urgently. It is actually the contradictory dilemma between the "quantitative reward" of university scientific research and the micro realization mechanism of "quality, contribution and influence" for stimulating original achievements. It is formed in the process of contradictory movement in which multiple actors, such as government agencies, university organizations, and individuals, are intertwined as stakeholders, and administrative logic and academic logic are nested. Its specific manifestations include the contradiction between rational economic man and academic man, the contradiction between quantitative fairness and the nature of scientific research innovation and the contradiction between the goal of scientific research award and the "how to award" the means of technological realization. The solution is to seek a balance point among multiple logics and different subjects, to transform the cognitive and decision-making modes, to step up the reform of university salary system as a breakthrough, and to promote the governance of university scientific research reward policy by classification.更多还原