【摘要】 一篇实证研究中存在多个子研究的多重研究在高水平论文中逐渐增多，但研究者对于各子研究之间的关系模式以及如何才能设计出高水平的多重研究并不明晰.基于知识创造视角，本文提出了一个包含3种基本的多重研究模式(即方法扩展模式、内容迭代模式和内容扩展模式)的一般性分析框架.应用这个框架对组织管理领域4个国际顶级学术期刊中39个多重研究的112个子研究关系进行了内容分析.研究结果表明，采用内容迭代模式、内容扩展模式和方法扩展模式的多重研究分别占33.33%、23.08%、12.82%,另有30.77%的研究采用了3种模式的混合.本研究分别对每种模式的子类进行了介绍，举例分析了子研究之间的关系，并对各种多重研究模式的选择进行了分析.最后，在分类介绍多重研究模式的基础上为未来设计多重研究提出了建议.更多还原

【Abstract】 Although the empirical research with more than one subsidiary studies is not rare, how to design a high-level multiple studies research is still not clear. Based on the knowledge creation perspective, this study proposes a general analysis framework including three basic patterns of multiple studies design, namely the method extension pattern, the content iteration pattern and the content extension pattern. Utilizing the framework, this study further analyzes the relationships between 112 subsidiary studies of 39 articles published in 4 major international management academic journals. The results show that the multiple studies using the content iteration pattern, the content extension pattern and the method extension pattern account for 33.33%,23.08% and 12.82%,respectively, and that 30.77% of the studies adopt a combination of the three patterns. Moreover, the subclasses of each pattern are introduced, and the relationships among the subsidiary studies and the choice of multiple studies patterns are analyzed. Finally, this study offers several suggestions for future design of multiple studies research.更多还原