【摘要】 自动驾驶汽车在给人们带来便利的同时也引发了肇事后刑事责任的归属问题。《汽车驾驶自动化分级》推荐性国家标准的发布标志着中国版驾驶自动化分级标准正式确立。基于刑法的自身属性和现实意义的考虑，自动驾驶汽车不能成为承担刑事责任的主体。用户在不同的驾驶场景中担任不同角色，未尽到相应的安全注意义务的，承担过失责任。自动驾驶汽车进入流通领域前即存在产品缺陷的，生产商不承担过失责任，但应对其规定严格责任；故意生产不符合安全标准的汽车的，构成生产不符合安全标准的产品罪。自动驾驶汽车投入流通后发现产品缺陷，生产商未尽到监督、管理义务的，应以不作为的过失行为追究其刑事责任。更多还原

【Abstract】 Self-driving vehicle brings convenience to people while causing the identification and attribution of criminal responsibility after causing accidents. The release of the "Taxonomy of Driving Automation for Vehicles"(recommended national standard) marks that the Chinese version of the automatic driving classification standard is formally established. Based on the consideration of the criminal law’s own attributes and practical significance, the self-driving vehicle can not be the subject of criminal responsibility. Users play different roles in different driving scenes and fail to fulfill the corresponding safety care obligations shall be liable for negligence. Before the self-driving vehicle enters the circulation area, there are product defects and the producer does not undertake the fault liability. However, the producer should be strictly responsible for its provisions. The intentional production of vehicles that do not meet the safety standards constitutes the crime of producing products that do not meet the safety standards. If the self-driving vehicle is found to be defective after the product is put into circulation, the manufacturer fails to fulfill his obligations of supervision and management. He shall be prosecuted for his criminal liability in the negligence act of omission.更多还原