【摘要】 民国《东莞县志》所录明万历三十二年(1604)《东莞县重修文庙儒学记》中的“舶可刘公”实为“舶司刘公”之讹。万历年间，陕西高陵人刘复初任广东市舶提举大约有十年之久，在明代广东海外贸易史上应当占有一席之地。有明一代东莞地区的市舶管理运作大致经历了三个发展阶段：明前期广东市舶司主管东莞等地市舶时期，在史料中未见到有东莞地方官员直接参与相关事务的记载；正德初到万历前期海道副使主导、东莞等地方官员参与市舶管理时期，除东莞地方官外，前任番禺县令也参与了整顿东莞抽分之事；万历后期至明末海道副使兼督、市舶提举专理、东莞县官员协助管理时期，东莞县还要从地方赋税中划拨出广东市舶提举司官员、提举员下官员和吏目的马丁编银，这在一定程度上反映出了明后期东莞地区市舶管理与具体运作的复杂情状。更多还原

【Abstract】 According to Dongguan xianzhi( Annals of Dongguan),in the Dongguan Xian Chongxiu Wenmiao Ruxue Ji( A Record of Repairing Confucius Temple in Dongguan County) of1604( the 32ndyear of Emperor Wanli),“Bo Ke Liugong”must be “Bo Si Liugong”. During the Wanli period,Liu Fuchu,a native of Gaoling,Shaanxi Province,served as the head of Guangdong Shibosi( Maritime Trade Bureau) for about ten years,and he must have played a part in Guangdong’s maritime trade during the Ming Dynasty. The maritime trade management in Dongguan had undergone three stages of development in the Ming Dynasty: 1. In the early Ming Dynasty,Guangdong Shibosi took charge of all local maritime trade affairs,and there were no historical records about the involvement of Dongguan’s officials in maritime trade affairs. 2. From Zhengde to the early Wanli period,maritime trade affairs were governed by the vice-supervisor of seaway patrolling with the engagement of local officials from Dongguan and other places. Furthermore,the former magistrate of Panyu also participated in readjusting the duties and taxes in Dongguan. 3. From the late Wanli period to the late Ming Dynasty,maritime trade affairs were supervised by the vice-superior of seaway patrolling and managed by the head of Shibosi with the assistance of local officials from Dongguan. Dongguan County was also responsible for the spending on the officials’ horses and servants in Guangdong Shibosi. This,to some extent,reflected the complicated maritime trade management in Dongguan in the mid-and late-Ming Dynasty.更多还原