节点文献

民事诉讼中无独立请求权第三人研究

Study on the Third Party without Independent Claim in Civil Proceedings

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【摘要】 我国民事诉讼法所规定的无独立请求权第三人制度具有维权功能、预防功能、解纷功能、民主功能、司法功能等诸多功能,有助于“纠纷一次性解决”程序价值之实现。但该制度在类型设置上缺乏原告型无独立请求权第三人的制度类型,同时对被告型无独立请求权第三人的诉权保护也规范不周,对于辅助型无独立请求权第三人在制度运作上过于强调法院的职权干预作用,无独立请求权第三人的诉讼地位和诉讼权利未能获得应有体现和保障。为此,本文提出了确立原告型第三人制度、完善被告型第三人制度、规范辅助型第三人制度以及赋予相对方异议权制度等修法建言。

【Abstract】 The system of third party without independent claim as stipulated in China’s civil proceedings has the right-maintaining, preventive, democratic and judicial functions, conducive to the realization of procedural value of "solution to disputes once for all". Nevertheless, this system lacks the institutional type of the third party without independent claim as a plaintiff, does not specify comprehensively the protective measures for the proceeding right of the third party without independent claim as a defendant, shows intervention in over-emphasizing the responsibilities and rights of court in institutional operation, and offers no guarantee for the litigation status and rights of the third party without independent claim. Accordingly, this paper proposes establishing the institution of third party as a plaintiff, improving the institution of third party as a defendant, regulating the institution of third party as an auxiliary, and empowering each other in dissent or dispute.

  • 【文献出处】 贵州民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ,Journal of Guizhou Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Sciences) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2022年04期
  • 【分类号】D925.1
  • 【下载频次】79
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络