节点文献

不同肠道清洁方法对内镜下肠息肉切除术前清洁疗效、患者配合度及治疗满意度的影响

Effect of Different Intestinal Cleaning Methods on Preoperative Cleaning Efficacy,Patient’s Coordination Degree and Disease Knowledge Awareness Rate of Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Polypectomy

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 骆菊英宁雪莲张丽洁刘英彭璐叶促芽肖婕卢如相李兰凤

【Author】 LUO Juying;NING Xuelian;ZHANG Lijie;LIU Ying;PENG Lu;YE Cuya;XIAO Jie;LU Ruxiang;LI Lanfeng;Yue Bei People’s Hospital;

【通讯作者】 骆菊英;

【机构】 广东省粤北人民医院

【摘要】 目的:不同肠道清洁方法对内镜下肠息肉切除术前清洁疗效、患者配合度及治疗满意度的影响。方法:选取2019年1-12月本院收治的肠息肉患者240例为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为对照组、试验A组和试验B组,每组80例。息肉切除术前分别采用不同的肠道清洁方法。对照组口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散;试验A组口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散结合常规左侧卧位清洁灌肠;试验B组给予口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散结合旋转体位清洁灌肠法灌肠。比较三组的肠道清洁度、治疗配合度、疾病知识知晓率、满意度。结果:试验A组清洁度高于对照组,试验B组清洁度高于对照组,试验B组清洁度高于试验A组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);三组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验A组主动准备、规范用药、体位保持、服从指令的评分均高于对照组,试验组配合度各项评分均高于对照组,试验B组配合度各项评分均高于试验A组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);三组各项比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验A组疾病知识、用药常识、护理知识、生活自理各项知晓率均高于对照组,试验B组各项知晓率均高于对照组,试验B组各项知晓率均高于试验A组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);三组比较各项差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验A组总满意高于对照组,试验B组总满意高于对照组,试验B组总满意高于试验A组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);三组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散结合旋转体位清洁灌肠法灌肠治疗能够提高患者的肠道清洁度、配合度和疾病知识知晓率,提升患者满意度,为内镜下肠息肉切除术提供良好的术前准备,有较高的临床应用价值。

【Abstract】 Objective:To study the effect of different intestinal cleaning methods on preoperative cleaning efficacy,patient’s coordination degree and disease knowledge awareness rate of endoscopic gastrointestinal polypectomy.Method:A total of 240 patients with intestinal polyps admitted to our hospital from January to December 2019 were selected as the research objects,they were divided into control group,experimental group A and experimental group B according to random number table method,80 cases in each group.Control group oral Compound Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte Powder;experimental group A oral Compound Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte Powder + conventional left recumbent position enema;experimental group B was given oral Compound Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte Powder + rotary posture cleaning enema.The intestinal cleanliness,enema treatment coordination,disease knowledge awareness rate and treatment satisfaction of the three groups were statistically compared.Result:The cleaning rate of experimental group A was higher than that of control group,the cleaning rate of experimental group B was higher than that of control group,the cleaning rate of experimental group B was higher than that of experimental group A,the differences were statistical significance (P<0.05);there was statistical significance among the three groups (P<0.05).The scores of active preparation,standardized medication,posture maintenance and instruction obedience in experimental group A were all higher than those in control group,the scores of cooperation degree in experimental group B were all higher than those in experimental group A,the differences were statistical significance (P<0.05);there were statistically significant differences among the three groups (P<0.05).The awareness rates of disease knowledge,medication knowledge,nursing knowledge and self-care in test group A were all higher than those in control group,those in experimental group B were all higher than those in control group,the differences were statistical significance (P<0.05);the differences among the three groups were statistically significant (P<0.05).The total satisfaction of experimental group A was higher than that of control group,the total satisfaction of experimental group B was higher than that of control group,the total satisfaction of experimental group B was higher than that of experimental group A,with statistical significance (P<0.05);there was statistical significance among the three groups (P<0.05).Conclusion:Oral Compound Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte Powder and rotary position cleaning enema treatment can improve the intestinal cleanliness of patients,improve the patient’s cooperation degree and disease knowledge awareness rate,improve patient satisfaction,and provide good preoperative preparation for endoscopic intestinal polypectomy,which has high clinical application value.

【基金】 2015年度广东省医学科研基金立项项目(A2015263)
  • 【文献出处】 中国医学创新 ,Medical Innovation of China , 编辑部邮箱 ,2021年05期
  • 【分类号】R473.6
  • 【下载频次】159
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络