【摘要】 目的:梳理采用不同耐力跑测试[800 m跑、805 m跑、1 500 m跑、1 609 m跑、12 min跑、20 m往返跑（20 m SRT）]评价健康人群■的效度研究,系统比较不同测试方法的效度差异。方法:检索了LISTA（EBSCO）、Pub Med（NLM）、Web of Science（TS）与中国知网（CNKI）数据库,采用Castro-Piňero的文献质量评价标准对纳入文献进行质量评价（Ross et al.,2016）。结果:800 m、805 m、1 000 m跑时间与■的相关系数（r）:男性儿童青少年为-0.224～-0.781,女性为-0.495～-0.697;男性成年人群为-0.219～-0.736,女性为-0.139～-0.626。1 500 m、1 609 m跑时间与■的r值:儿童、青少年为-0.603～-0.790;成年人群为-0.627～-0.729。12 min跑距离与■r值:青少年儿童0.977（男）、0.964（女）;成年人群为0.730～0.897,预测方程的R值为0.87,0.872（男）、0.862（女）。20 m SRT预测方程值与直接测量■的r值:青少年儿童为0.60～0.90,决定系数（R²）为0.46～0.81,标准误（SEE）为3.33～7.26 ml·kg^-1·min^-1;成年人群为0.43～0.94,R²为0.87～0.88,SEE为1.38～3.00 ml·kg^-1·min^-1。结论:作为有氧能力（■）的间接评价方法,800 m、805 m、1 000 m跑效度最低,波动幅度大;1 500 m、1 609 m跑效度较高,适用人群广泛;12 min跑、20 m SRT效度最高,并且效度稳定。在实际应用中,应根据研究目的、监测人群合理选择,谨慎解读其监测结果。针对我国人群的耐力跑评测有氧能力（■）效度的研究有待进一步开展。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective:This study focused on evaluation of healthy people’s maximal oxygen uptake （■） and peak oxygen uptake （■）,using different types of endurance running tests[800 m,805 m,1500 m,1 609 m,12 min running,20 m shuttle run test （20 m SRT）].The study aimed to investigate validity differences between those running tests,and to provide a scientific basis for future research and practical applications.Methods:The literature search was conducted by using the LISTA,Pub Med,Web of Science,and China National Knowledge Internet databases.Literature quality was evaluated by using a method developed by Castro-Piňero（Ross et al.,2016）.Results:The correlation coefficients （r） between the 800 m and 1 000 m running times and the ■ in these publications were-0.224 to 0.781 for children and adolescents （boys）,and-0.495 to 0.697 for girls,-0.219 to-0.736 for men,and-0.139 to-0.626 for women.The children’s and adolescents’r for 1 500 m and 1 609 m running ranged from-0.603 to-0.790,while for adults it ranged from-0.627 to-0.729.The r of 12 min running was 0.977 （boys） and 0.964 （girls） for children and adolescents,and for adults it ranged from 0.730 to 0.897.The r of the prediction equation was 0.87 （both sexes）,0.872 （males） and 0.862 （females）.The r of the predicted equation of the 20 m SRT was 0.60 to 0.90 in children and adolescents,while the determination coefficient （R²） ranged from 0.46 to 0.81,and the standard error （SEE） ranged from 3.33 to 7.26 ml·kg^-1·min^-1.The adults’r ranged from 0.43 to 0.94,R²from 0.87 to 0.88,and SEE from 1.38 to 3.00 ml·kg^-1·min^-1.Conclusion:The validity of the 800 m and 1 000 m runs was the lowest,and the fluctuant range was large when evaluating the ■.In terms of 1 500 m and 1 609 m running,validity was in the medium.The validity of 12 min running and the 20 m SRT was the highest and was stable.In future studies,researchers should select suitable measurement tools based on the purpose and population,and the results should be prudently interpreted.Further studies are needed to evaluate the validity of ■ via endurance running in Chinese populations.更多还原