节点文献

基线血压水平与急性缺血性脑卒中早期降压治疗3个月结局的关系

The relationship between baseline blood pressure and 3 months outcome of early antihypertensive therapy in acute ischemic stroke

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 李东岳李群伟孔艳李栋许锬张永红张金涛

【Author】 LI Dongyue;LI Qunwei;KONG Yan;Department of encephalopathy,Tai’an traditional Chinese medicine hospital;

【通讯作者】 张金涛;

【机构】 泰安市中医医院脑病科解放军第九六〇医院泰安院区神经内科山东第一医科大学公共卫生学院山东第一医科大学第二附属医院神经内科肥城市人民医院神经内科苏州大学公共卫生学院

【摘要】 目的探讨基线血压水平与急性缺血性脑卒中早期降压治疗3 m结局关系。方法收集2009年8月-2013年5月发病48 h内住院且经影像学确诊合并高血压的急性期缺血性脑卒中患者828例,根据入组时收缩压(Systolic Blood Pressure,SBP)水平分为140~160 mm Hg组(n=276)、160~180 mm Hg组(n=350)、180~200 mm Hg组(n=158)、200~220 mm Hg组(n=44),随机给予降压治疗或不予降压治疗。降压治疗者24 h内降压10%~20%,收缩压和舒张压在7 d分别低于140 mm Hg和90 mm Hg,并在2 w内维持在这一水平。不予降压治疗者停止或不给予降压药物,所有患者测量并记录血压水平。比较患者出院后3 m死亡率和良好预后率。结果随访3 m,140~160 mm Hg组降压治疗患者死亡率明显高于无降压治疗患者(13.7%vs 5.8%,P <0.05),良好预后率明显低于无降压治疗患者(65.5%vs 77.4%,P <0.05),160~180 mm Hg组、180~200 mm Hg组、200~220 mm Hg组死亡率比较差异无统计学意义(9.2%vs 13.4%,11.8%vs 12.3%13.6%vs 9.1%,P> 0.05),良好预后率比较差异亦无统计学意义(71.8%vs 62.6%,69.4%vs 60.3%,54.5%vs 59.1%,P> 0.05)。结论急性缺血性脑卒中患者轻度血压升高时(SBP 140~160 mm Hg)不宜降压治疗;中高度血压升高时(SBP 160~220 mm Hg)降压治疗对3 m结局影响是中性的。

【Abstract】 Objective To explore the outcome relationship between the baseline blood pressure level and the early antihypertensive therapy of acute ischemic stroke for 3 months. Methods A total of 828 patients who were admitted to hospital within 48 hours of onset and diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke with hypertension through imageological examination from August 2009 to May 2013 were collected. They were divided into 140 ~ 160 mm Hg group( n = 276),160 ~ 180 mm Hg group( n = 350),180 ~ 200 mm Hg group( n = 158),and 200 ~ 220 mm Hg group( n = 44) according to the level of systolic pressure at the time of enrollment,and given randomly or not given antihypertensive therapy. For the patients receiving the antihypertensive therapy,the blood pressure was reduced by 10% ~ 20% within 24 hours,the systolic pressure and diastolic pressure were lower than 140 mm Hg and 90 mm Hg respectively at 7 days,and maintained at this level for 2 weeks. For the patients not receiving the antihypertensive therapy,antihypertensive drugs were discontinued or not given,and all patients were measured,with the blood pressure levels recorded. The mortality and good prognosis rate were compared at 3 months after discharge. Results Through 3 months of follow-up,the mortality of patients with antihypertensive therapy in the 140 ~ 160 mm Hg group was significantly higher than that of those without antihypertensive therapy( 13. 7%vs 5. 8%,P < 0. 05),the good prognosis rate was significantly lower than that of those without antihypertensive therapy( 65. 5% vs 77. 4%,P < 0. 05),there was no statistically significant difference in mortality and all-cause mortality between160 ~ 180 mm Hg group,180 ~ 200 mm Hg group,and 200 ~ 220 mm Hg group( 9. 2% vs 13. 4%,11. 8% vs 12. 3%,13. 6% vs 9. 1%,P > 0. 05),and the difference in good prognosis rate was not statistically significant( 71. 8% vs62. 6%,69. 4% vs 60. 3%,54. 5% vs 59. 1%,P > 0. 05).Conclusion Patients with acute ischemic stroke should not receive antihypertensive therapy when blood pressure is elevated mildly( SBP 140 ~ 160 mm Hg); the impact of antihypertensive therapy on 3-month outcome is neutral in case of moderate to high blood pressure elevation( SBP 160 ~ 220 mm Hg).

【基金】 泰安市科技发展计划项目(No.2018NS0231);苏州大学重大国际合作项目(No.2007-16)
  • 【文献出处】 中风与神经疾病杂志 ,Journal of Apoplexy and Nervous Diseases , 编辑部邮箱 ,2021年01期
  • 【分类号】R743.3
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】104
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络