【摘要】 运用历史地理唯物主义和女性主义地理学视角,建立奥斯曼在19世纪巴黎"创造性破坏"的城市规划和空间生产,与第一波女权运动的知识联结,推导女性主义地理学的史前史及其未来方向。研究发现,巴黎都市现代性的形成,使性别问题一开始就与阶级问题构成交叉关系;表现为"城—郊"二元结构及其在家庭私人空间、城市公共空间、拱廊街为代表的阈限空间等展现出来的有关资产阶级沙龙女性、工人阶级贫困女性和都市漫游者的三种不同形态的性别地理,以及表征主义和革命行动的两种性别政治。都市现代性的性别地理研究,为反思生物本质主义的性别体制、关注"后人类"未来基于赛博格、数字媒介城市和星球城市化的人地关系的性别研究,提供了未来方向。更多还原

【Abstract】 This paper concerns the gendered geographies from the perspective of the historical-geographical materialism, situated in the great transformation of Paris in 19 c under the creative destruction of Haussmann.Exploring the relationship between the production of space by the power-subject and the gendered places related to women, gender, class, etc. in either private/family space, urban public space, or liminal space such as Arcade Passage in Paris, the author attempts to figure out the connection of this prehistory of 19 c to the whole geneology of feminist geography launched in 1970 s and its future research direction. The study holds that: 1) The creative destruction of Haussmann to Paris, based on the enlightenment rationality and the masculinity of modernist urban planning, divided the urban space of Paris into a dual structure consisting of the urban core and the suburban edge, thus realizing the spatial segregation between the bourgeoisie and the working class, and constructing the internal differentiation of women fractioned by their class status. 2) The development of industrialization and urbanization of Paris had strengthened the spatial division between the family sphere and the public sphere, as well as the establishment of family gender regime under the traditional patriarchy highlighting the biological sex essentialism and regarding women only as the maternal role in family. 3) The internal contradiction of urban modernity produced the third kind of gender geography in liminal space different from the spaces of Paris with "two kinds of spaces and classes in one city". 4) Although this paper discusses the gender geographies of urban modernity occurred about two hundred years ago, this "obsolete" research is still very "contemporary" connecting the pre-modern, the modern, the postmodern, and even our 21 st century future.更多还原