【摘要】 目的:观察优质护理对主动脉夹层术后患者不良情绪和护理满意度的影响。方法:选择接受主动脉夹层手术的患者96例,按随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组各48例。对照组术后给予常规护理,观察组在对照组基础上给予优质护理干预。比较2组干预前后的焦虑和抑郁情况,统计2组术后卧床时间和住院时间及术后并发症情况,比较2组护理满意度。结果:干预前,2组汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分及汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后,2组HAMA评分及HAMD评分较干预前降低,且观察组HAMA评分及HAMD评分均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后卧床时间和住院时间均短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率为14.58%,低于对照组41.67%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组护理满意度为58.33%,观察组为81.25%,观察组护理满意度优于对照组(Z=2.112,P<0.05)。结论:优质护理干预主动脉夹层术后患者,有利于促进术后恢复,提升护理满意度。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective: To observe the effect of high-quality nursing on negative emotions and nursing satisfaction of patients after surgery for aortic dissection. Methods:A total of 96 cases of patients who received surgery for aortic dissection were selected, and were divided into the control group and the observation group according to the random number table method,48 cases in each group. The control group was given postoperative routine nursing,and the observation group was additionally given the intervention of high-quality nursing based on the nursing of the control group. The status of anxiety and depression before and after intervention was compared between the two groups. Postoperative bed rest time, the hospitalization time, and postoperative complications were counted in the two groups. The nursing satisfaction was compared between the two groups. Results:Before intervention,when compared scores of Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA)and Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD) between the two groups,there was no significance being found in the difference(P>0.05). After intervention,scores of HAMA and HAMD in the two groups were decreased when compared with those before intervention, and the two scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, differences being significant(P<0.05). Postoperative bed rest time and the hospitalization time in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group,differences being significant(P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was 14.58% in the observation group, lower than that of 41.67% in the control group, the difference being significant(P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction was 81.25% in the observation group, better than that of 58.33% in the control group, the difference being significant(Z=2.112,P<0.05). Conclusion:For patients after surgery for aortic dissection,the intervention of high-quality nursing conduces to promoting postoperative recovery and improving nursing satisfaction.更多还原