【摘要】 朱自清日记中存在大量外文书写条目,王瑶曾整理若干条目公开发表。后来《朱自清全集·日记编》又另请人加以翻译。两本条目内容常有较大差异。在目前无法见到原始手稿的情况下,将两本比勘考辨,有助于接近事实:参差处能够互为补充,抵牾处则能显示出歧义的缝隙,进而引导考辨方向,或提供意外线索,再结合翻译规律,很多时候能够还原出合乎逻辑的"真相"。沿此举出7例展开考察,可澄清若干事实。一般说来,王瑶对于清华大学及朱自清的生活史较为熟悉,对日记语体的掌握也更加熟稔,一些内容翻译起来更加准确、翔实,但翻译发表时往往有所删略;也有一些条目,全集本在准确性上胜过王译本。更多还原

【Abstract】 Many items of Zhu Ziqing’s diary were written in English and Japanese.Parts of them were translated by Wang Yao and included in his edition which was published in 1963.When the diary became the two volumes of Completed Works of Zhu Ziqing in the 1980 s,these items in foreign languages were re-translated by others.There are many differences between the two editions.This paper intends to find out some historical facts by comparing the two editions.更多还原