节点文献

超声、超声造影和X线钼靶联合诊断在早期乳腺癌中的应用

Diagnostic value of ultrasonography,contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and X-ray mammography in early-stage breast cancer

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 阿米娜·艾尔肯巴妍杨晓萍邹媛高军喜王淑霞

【Author】 Amina Aierken;BA Yan;YANG Xiao-ping;ZOU Yuan;GAO Jun-xi;WANG Shu-xia;Health Management Center,The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University;Department of Abdominal Ultrasonography Diagnose,The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University;

【通讯作者】 王淑霞;

【机构】 新疆医科大学第一附属医院健康管理院新疆医科大学第一附属医院超声诊断科

【摘要】 目的:探讨超声、超声造影、X线钼靶及三者联合应用对早期乳腺癌的诊断价值。方法:收集行超声、超声造影、X线钼靶及三者联合诊断的156例乳腺癌和260例乳腺良性病变患者的病例资料,统计分析超声、超声造影、X线钼靶3种检查方法单独及联合使用对早期乳腺癌诊断率的差异。结果:超声单独诊断早期乳腺癌敏感度、特异度、假阳性率、假阴性率、符合率分别为86.55%、58.25%、41.75%、13.45%、68.62%;超声造影单独诊断早期乳腺癌,敏感度、特异度、假阳性率、假阴性率、符合率分别为93.10%、70.73%、29.27%、6.89%、77.90%;X线钼靶单独诊断早期乳腺癌敏感度、特异度、假阳性率、假阴性率、符合率分别为64.00%、66.32%、33.67%、36.00%、65.32%;三者联合使用诊断早期乳腺癌敏感度、特异度、假阳性率、假阴性率、符合率分别为92.30%、98.40%、1.58%、7.69%、96.62%。单独应用超声造影诊断准确度高于单独应用超声及X线钼靶,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);三者联合应用的诊断准确度均高于单独应用超声、超声造影、X线钼靶,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:单独应用超声造影诊断早期乳腺癌诊断符合率高于单独应用超声及X线钼靶。三者联合应用可以提高诊断早期乳腺癌的准确度,对于早期乳腺癌的早诊断、早治疗有重要临床意义。

【Abstract】 Objective:To investigate the diagnostic value of ultrasonography,contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and X-ray mammography in early-stage breast cancer.Methods:The clinical and imaging data of 156 patients with breast cancer and 260 patients with benign tumor of breast who underwent ultrasonography,contrast enhanced ultrasonography as well as X-ray mammography were retrospectively analyzed.The respective and combined diagnostic rates of ultrasonography,contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and X-ray mammography were evaluated and differences among them were discussed.Results:The sensitivity,specificity,false positive rate,false negative rate and coincidence rate respectively were 86.55 %,58.25 %,41.75%,13.45% and68.62% for ultrasonography in 103 early-stage breast cancer patients.While,the sensitivity,specificity,false positive rate,false negative rate and coincidence rate respectively were 93.10%,70.73%,29.27%,6.89% and 77.90% for contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in 54 patients with early-stage breast cancer.For 96 patients who underwent X-ray mammography,the sensitivity,specificity,false positive rate,false negative rate and coincidence rate respectively were 64.00%,66.32%,33.67%,36.00% and 65.32%.The combined diagnosis with ultrasonography,contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and X-ray mammography showed sensitivity,specificity,false positive rate,false negative rate and coincidence rate respectively with 92.30 %,98.40 %,1.58%,7.69% and 96.62%.The diagnostic accuracy rate is higher in contrast-enhance ultrasonography alone than ultrasonography and X-ray mammography alone(P<0.05).The combined diagnostic rate was higher than single use of ultrasonography,contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and X-ray mammography.Conclusion:Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography showed higher diagnostic rate in patients with early-stage breast cancer than ultrasonography and X-ray mammography.Combined diagnosis improved the diagnostic rate in patients with early-stage breast cancer,thus,play a crucial role in early diagnosis and treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

  • 【文献出处】 中国现代普通外科进展 ,Chinese Journal of Current Advances in General Surgery , 编辑部邮箱 ,2021年03期
  • 【分类号】R737.9;R445.1;R730.44
  • 【被引频次】8
  • 【下载频次】100
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络