【摘要】 《民法典》"侵权责任编"中生态环境损害赔偿请求权基础不明,相关规范中生态系统服务功能的角色也很模糊,所以,环境物权有成为生态环境损害赔偿请求权基础的必要性。生态系统服务功能是环境物权适合的客体,且生态系统服务功能法律性质上是一种无体物并可以货币化。生态系统服务功能内容上涵盖环境容量和自然资源,可以被特定化和量化的生态系统服务功能损失是生态环境损害赔偿责任的前提,也是它的请求权基础。基于《民法典》中绿色原则、物之定义、物权之目的等规范的体系化解释是实现生态系统服务功能作为物权客体的进路,并以未来修订《环境保护法》加入相关环境物权的方式使之实现。更多还原

【Abstract】 There still are few questions about what is the base of claim right for ecological environment damage compensation and the role of ecosystem service function in civil code. So,environmental real right should be the base of claim right. Ecosystem service function should be an object of real right. Ecosystem service function is a res in corporales,and it should be monetization. Therefore,the precondition of ecological environment damage compensation is the specialization and quantization of loss of ecosystem service function. It is also the base of claim right. As the object of environmental real right, ecosystem service function includes environmental capacity and natural resources. Based on the systematic interpretation of purpose,definition and principles of real right with the green principle,ecosystem service function could be a kind of real right. And,it could be added into the environmental protection law as an environmental real right.更多还原