节点文献

比较视域下高等教育质量保障的国际经验与启示——基于UNESCO、OECD、EU政策文本分析

International Experience and Enlightenment of Higher Education Quality Assurance from the Perspective of Comparison

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 陈新忠李保忠

【Author】 CHEN Xinzhong;LI Baozhong;Huazhong Agricultural University;

【机构】 华中农业大学

【摘要】 联合国教科文组织(NUESCO)、经合组织(OECD)和欧盟(EU)作为具有国际影响力的重要机构,分别制定了高等教育质量保障的规则标准、框架体系和行动指南。从质量保障内涵和目标上看,UNESCO强调政策引导、OECD注重多维统筹、EU突出质量评估。从质量保障框架上看,三大国际组织主要聚焦于内外部质量保障机制、质量保障机构、质量文化以及国际合作等方面。借鉴国际组织经验,我国高等教育质量保障应构建内外互通的质量保障体系;健全独立自主的质量保障机构;发展自觉自信的质量保障文化;加强国际合作的质量保障认知。

【Abstract】 As important institutions with international influence, the United Nations Educational,Scientific and Cultural Organization(UNESCO),the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(OECD)and the European Union(EU)have formulated corresponding rules, framework systems and action guidelines for quality assurance of higher education. In terms of the connotation and objectives of quality assurance, UNESCO emphasizes policy guidance; OECD pays attention to multidimensional integration; and EU emphasizes quality assessment. From the perspective of quality assurance framework, the three major international organizations mainly focus on internal and external quality assurance mechanisms, quality assurance institutions, quality culture and international cooperation. Learning from the experience of international organizations, China’s higher education quality assurance should build a quality assurance system with internal and external communication, improve independent quality assurance institutions, develop a self-conscious and self-confident quality assurance culture, and strengthen the quality assurance awareness of international cooperation.

【基金】 国家社会科学基金2019年度重大项目“以教育发展促进收入代际流动性的机制与政策研究”(19ZDA066)
  • 【文献出处】 现代教育管理 ,Modern Education Management , 编辑部邮箱 ,2021年01期
  • 【分类号】G647
  • 【被引频次】5
  • 【下载频次】1862
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络