【摘要】 系统论宪法学研究以社会功能分析作为逻辑起点,在研究立场上偏向于经验主义,在方法论上贯彻"从存在推导出当为"的基本论证模式。其认为社会生活的各种经验是宪法实践的规范基础,因而试图通过客观描述系统现象及系统现象得以形成的事实要素,对宪法实践作出妥适的解释与说明。然而,建立在全社会功能分化基础上的系统概念,并不能使特定的宪法实践脱离一般宪法准则。并且,由于对宪法实践的描述经常需要运用价值判断,存在与当为之间又无法进行逻辑推导,系统论宪法学的学术主张虽有一定的现实解释力,但在理论深层仍有反思空间。更多还原

【Abstract】 The systematic theory of constitutional law takes the differentiation of social functions as the logical premise, leans towards empiricism in research standpoint, and implements the basic model of "deduction from ‘is’ to ‘ought’" in methodology. This theory takes various experiences of social life as the normative basis of constitutional practice and attempts to provide appropriate interpretation and explanation of constitutional practice by objectively describing the systematic phenomena and all the elements that form the systematic phenomena. However, the concept of a system based on the functional differentiation of the whole society cannot separate specific constitutional practice from general constitutional norms. Moreover, since the description of constitutional practice often requires the use of value judgment, and there is no logical derivation between "is" and "ought", the academic proposition of systematic constitutional law, although has certain practical explanatory power, still needs reflections on the deep theoretical level.更多还原