【摘要】 目的系统整合心血管病患者对发病风险沟通真实体验的质性研究。方法计算机检索PubMed、Web of Science、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Cochrane Library、中国知网(China National Knowledge Infrastructure, CNKI)及万方数据库等,检索时限从建库至2020年2月,主题为心血管病患者发病风险沟通体验的质性研究。采用澳大利亚JBI(Joanna Briggs Institute)质性研究质量评价标准评价文献质量,运用Meta整合方法对结果进行汇总分析。结果最终共纳入12篇研究,其中A级5篇、B级7篇,提炼出23个研究结果,归纳成3个整合结果,即风险沟通无效信息特征(含3个类别)、风险沟通感受及应对(含3个类别),风险沟通需求及期望(含4个类别)。结论专业人员在开展心血管病发病风险沟通时应充分考虑语言、形式、时间、角色、态度及信任关系等对沟通效果的直接或间接影响。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To synthesize qualitative studies on patients’ experiences of cardiovascular diseases recurrence risk communication.Methods PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO,CINAH,Cochrane Library, CNKI and WANFANG databases were searched from inception to February 2020, qualitative studies related to cardiovascular risk communication were collected, JBI Checklist for Qualitative Research was used for quality assessment and meta-synthesis was conducted.Results A total of 12 studies( 5 of A level and 7 of B level) were included, 23 synthesized findings were grouped according to their similarities to form 3 integrated results: characteristics of invalid risk communication information, risk communication experience and coping strategies, and risk communication preference.Conclusions Professionals should carefully consider the direct or indirect influence of language, form, time, role, attitude and trust relationship on the effectiveness of communication when carrying out cardiovascular disease risk communication.更多还原