【摘要】 对于人工智能生成物的著作权的归属,学术界提出了人工智能法律人格说、人工智能所有者说、人工智能编程设计者说、人工智能使用者说、社会公共领域说等观点。人工智能生成物是否构成著作权法意义上的作品,应坚持客观标准,并基于作品的客观构成要件予以判断。而对于其作品的权利归属问题,应以人工智能的性质为基础判断人工智能是否具有法律人格,再区分弱人工智能与强人工智能以确定权利归属。更多还原

【Abstract】 On the copyright ownership of artificial intelligence products,academic circles have put forward ideas such as artificial intelligence legal personality theory,artificial intelligence owner theory,artificial intelligence programming designer theory,artificial intelligence user theory,and social public domain theory. Regarding whether artificial intelligence products constitute works in the sense of copyright law,objective standards should be adhered to and judgments should be made based on the objective constituent elements of the work. As for the ownership of the rights of his works,we should judge whether artificial intelligence has a legal personality based on the nature of artificial intelligence,and then distinguish weak artificial intelligence and strong artificial intelligence to determine the ownership of rights.更多还原