节点文献

马克思视域下的自由

Freedom from the perspective of marx

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 刘文杰

【Author】 LIU Wen-jie;School of Marxism,Shandong University;

【机构】 山东大学马克思主义学院

【摘要】 受限与自由并非截然对立,而是相互交错、辩证统一,这一点需从马克思的视角予以解析。人从动物进化而来,既有自然规定性需要,也有自我规定性需要。满足自然规定性需要的活动,哪怕出于主观自愿,依然不自由,满足自我规定性需要的活动才是自由的活动。自我规定性需要与自然规定性需要共存于一身,规范着自然规定性需要。若突破了自我规定性需要的管制,满足自然规定性需要的活动就是恶,限制作恶之人其实是帮其恢复自由,此时受限与自由就是同一的。除引起恶之外,自然规定性需要还能异化自由的活动。但人自我生成的本性一定能压制住恶,一定能克服异化,一定能使满足自我规定性需要的活动充实人类所有领域,这便是自由的实现。

【Abstract】 Limitation and freedom are not diametrically opposed,but intertwined and dialectically unified,which needs to be analyzed from the perspective of Marx. Human beings evolved from animals and have both natural and self-stipulation needs. Activities that meet the needs of nature are not free,even if they are subjective and voluntary.Activities that meet the needs of self-stipulation are free activities. The self-stipulation needs coexist with the naturalstipulation needs and regulate the natural-stipulation needs. If we break through the regulation of self-stipulation needs,the activities to meet the natural-stipulation needs are evil,and restricting the perpetrators is actually to help them recover freedom. At this time,limitation and freedom are the same. In addition to causing evil,natural-stipulation needs can also alienate free activities. But the nature of man’s self-generation must be able to suppress evil,overcome alienation,and fill all fields of human beings with activities that meet the needs of self-stipulation,which is the realization of freedom.

【关键词】 自由限制自然规定性自我规定性
【Key words】 freedomlimitationNatural-stipulationSelf-stipulation
【基金】 国家社科基金重大项目(18ZDA001);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(11JZD003)
  • 【文献出处】 河北工程大学学报(社会科学版) ,Journal of Hebei University of Engineering(Social Science Edition) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2021年01期
  • 【分类号】A81
  • 【下载频次】146
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络