【摘要】 生活垃圾焚烧行业具有很大的碳减排潜力,但目前还缺乏可靠的碳排放计算方法。以舟山市某垃圾热解气化焚烧厂为例,分别采用平衡法和CCER方法学对该厂中的碳排放和碳减排量进行了对比计算。由平衡法计算得该厂单位垃圾碳排放量为0.61 t CO₂e/t,其中,化石源碳燃烧产生的碳排放量为0.28 t CO₂e/t,生物源碳碳排放为0.33 t CO₂e/t （该部分可产生碳减排效益）;CCER方法学计算所得的基准线排放量为0.53 t CO₂e/t,项目排放量为0.29 t CO₂e/t,项目减排量为0.24 t CO₂e/t。两种方法学的计算结果基本一致。平衡法可以对CCER方法学中项目排放量的垃圾焚烧产生的排放项进行补充,同时是一种简便快捷、准确性高、价格低廉的碳排放在线分析的可行方法。但仍需对我国垃圾组分进行特定分析以完善平衡法。更多还原

【Abstract】 Municipal solid waste（MSW）incineration industry has great potential for carbon emission reduction,but few reliable methods are applied for carbon emission calculation. Balance Method and CCER Method were used to calculate the carbon emissions and carbon emission reduction of a small scale waste pyrolysis-gasification incineration plant in Zhoushan,China. According to Balance Method,carbon emissions per unit of MSW were 0.61 t CO₂ e/t,emissions from fossil and biomass components were 0.28 and 0.33 t CO₂ e/t respectively,the emissions from biomass could be treated as carbon emission reduction.Baseline emissions,project emissions and project emission reduction were 0.53,0.29 and 0.24 t CO₂ e/t respectively in CCER Method. The results of the two methods were basically the same. Balance Method can supplement CCER Method in the waste incineration emissions of project. Moreover,it is also a simple,fast,accurate and inexpensive way to analyze carbon emissions online. However,specific analysis of MSW components in China is necessary to improve Balance Method.更多还原