【摘要】 中华书局版《史记》修订本校勘精审,然亦难免有未尽之处。今参以《史记》殿本所附校勘记《史记考证》,发现《史记》修订本存在错校、漏校之处十余则。其讹误之处,或有违文法,或穿凿附会,或与历史文献相左。为使《史记》正文更趋完善,本文将其讹误之处一一拈出,并在清人基础上加以考察辨正,以期有裨于《史记》文本研究。更多还原

【Abstract】 The revised collation of the Records of the Historian published by Zhonghua Book Company is quite excellent,but it still has some inevitable deficiencies. According to the collation records of the Research on the Records of the Historian attached to the imperial edition of the Records of the Historian,it is found that there are more than ten pieces of misreading or missing proofreading in the revision. These errors are ungrammatical,eisegetical,or inconsistent with historical documents. In order to make the main body of the Records of the Historian more satisfactory,this paper has located the errors are one by one,examined and corrected them based on the predecessors in the Qing dynasty with the expectation to help the textual study of the Records of the Historian.更多还原