【摘要】 目的:探讨MV技术与超声造影对甲状腺结节的诊断价值。方法:对本院2019年1月～2019年7月收治的78例甲状腺结节患者术前分别应用MV技术及超声造影技术评估甲状腺结节良恶性,以术后病理结果作为诊断金标准,分别判断其对甲状腺结节诊断的准确率、灵敏度、特异度。结果:甲状腺结节患者78例,共112个甲状腺结节,经术后病理证实良性甲状腺结节36个,恶性甲状腺结节76个。准确率:MV 85.71%;CEUS 91.96%,常规超声75.00%;灵敏度:MV 89.47%;CEUS 96.05%,常规超声78.94%;特异度:MV 77.78%;CEUS 83.33%,常规超声66.67%。结论:在甲状腺结节诊断准确率、灵敏度、特异度上,MV技术与超声造影技术均优于常规超声检查技术,但MV技术较CEUS尚有差距。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective: To investigate the value of MV and CEUS in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Methods: 78 patients with thyroid nodules admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to July 2019 were preoperatively assessed by MV technology and contrast-enhanced ultrasound technology to assess benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Postoperative pathological results were used as the diagnostic gold standard, respectively judge the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Results: There were 112 thyroid nodules in 78 patients,36 were benign and 76 were malignant. Accuracy: MV 85.71%; CEUS 91.96%; ultrasound 75.00%. Sensitivity: MV 89.47%; CEUS 96.05%; ultrasound 78.94%. Specificity: MV 77.78%; CEUS 83.33%; ultrasound 66.67%. Conclusion: In the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of thyroid nodule diagnosis, MV technology and CEUS are superior to conventional ultrasound technology(P<0.05), but there is still a gap between MV and CEUS.更多还原