节点文献

规范化血液透析安装预冲质量改进的多中心研究

Quality improvement of standardized hemodialysis installation and pre-flush: a multicenter study

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 梁俊卿王颖马思慧丁红萝莉候玉霞郭苹王秀荣平金超刘冬梅彭颖姜晓蕊甘良英左力王梅

【Author】 LIANG Jun-qing;WANG Ying;MA Si-hui;DING Hong;LUO Li;HOU Yu-xia;GUO Ping;WANG Xiu-rong;PING Jin-chao;LIU Dong-mei;PENG Ying;JIANG Xiao-rui;GAN Liang-ying;ZUO Li;WANG Mei;Center of Blood Purification, Department of Nephrology, Peking University People’s Hospital;Center of Blood Purification, Beijing Luhe Hospital;Center of Blood Purification, Miyun District Hospital;Center of Blood Purification, Peking University International Hospital;Center of Blood Purification, Shijingshan District Hospital;Center of Blood Purification, Beijing Aviation General Hospital;Center of Blood Purification, Beijing Bo’ai Hospital;Center of Blood Purification, Changping District Hospital;Center of Blood Purification, Chuiyangliu Hospital;Center of Blood Purification, Xicheng District Zhanlan Road Hospital;Jiaodong Bethune Center of Blood Purification;

【通讯作者】 王颖;

【机构】 北京大学人民医院肾内科血液净化中心北京市潞河医院血液净化中心北京市密云区医院血液净化中心北京大学国际医院血液净化中心北京市石景山区医院血液净化中心北京航空总医院血液净化中心中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院血液净化中心北京市昌平区医院血液净化中心北京市垂杨柳医院血液净化中心北京市西城区展览路医院血液净化中心胶东白求恩血液净化中心

【摘要】 目的应用规范化血液透析管路安装预冲质量表提升管路安装预冲环节的护理质量。方法设计规范化安装预冲质量控质表,根据该质量控质内容对11家血液透析联合体机构进行调查、培训,并采用该质量控质表作为护理质量改进的评估工具,在培训前后对各家透析单位的安装预冲进行评估并反馈、讨论。结果预冲时间在质量改进前后无明显变化(t=-0.296,P=0.774),培训前后分别为(27.05±4.59)min;培训后平均(27.50±4.03)min。质量改进前后各项达标率均有所提高,总得分高于改进前,差异有统计学意义(t=-3.993,P=0.003)。研究单位对该质量控质表的均认为简单、实用。结论采用安装预冲质量控质清单进行培训与评估,具有简便性、实用性,可作为临床护士长针对血液透析安装预冲质量控制的定期评估方法,临床上仍需重视透析管路安装预冲的持续性护理质量改进。

【Abstract】 Objective To improve the quality of care in installation and pre-flush for hemodialysis therapy by applying a quality control checklist. Methods A quality control checklist to standardize the installation and pre-flush was designed and used as an evaluation tool to investigate 11 hemodialysis institutions/centers during the priming process. The medical workers in the 11 dialysis centers were then trained according to content in the checklist. The processes of installation and pre-flush of each dialysis unit were evaluated and the efficacy of the training was obtained and discussed after training. Results There was no significant difference in the priming time before and after the quality improvement(27.05 ± 4.59 vs. 27.50 ± 4.03 min;t=-0.296, P=0.774). All of the compliance rates were improved after quality improvement, and the overall score was higher after the training compared to that before the training(t=-3.993, P=0.003). All of the 11 dialysis centers considered that the checklist was quite simple and practical. Conclusion The priming quality control checklist is convenient and practical for training and evaluation. This checklist can be used by the clinical quality managers as a regular evaluation method for the quality control of installation and pre-flush for hemodialysis therapy.

【基金】 北京市科技计划项目,课题号:2107000084,基金批准号Z131107002213122
  • 【文献出处】 中国血液净化 ,Chinese Journal of Blood Purification , 编辑部邮箱 ,2020年05期
  • 【分类号】R473.5
  • 【被引频次】1
  • 【下载频次】220
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络