节点文献
系统性红斑狼疮平面健康教育材料的可读性评价
Readability Evaluation of Printed Education Materials Regarding Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
【摘要】 目的:评价系统性红斑狼疮平面健康教育材料的可读性,为修订和开发与系统性红斑狼疮患者健康素养相匹配的平面健康教育材料提供依据。方法:选择合肥市、南京市、杭州市、上海市、深圳市、长沙市部分三级甲等医院正在使用的系统性红斑狼疮平面健康教育材料作为评估对象,从平均句长、非常用词次数、难度系数等方面评估文本因素,使用SAM量表评估非文本因素。结果:共收集50份系统性红斑狼疮平面健康教育材料,难度系数为(68.92±7.54);SAM量表总分为(46.67±9.73),其中有20份为不适用,30份为适用,没有材料被评为适用很好;文化适宜性维度得分最高(66.58±31.63),插图与图表维度得分最低(22.43±16.18)。结论:系统性红斑狼疮平面健康教育材料的可读性不佳,编写和修订时应注意降低文本阅读难度,从内容、素养需求、插图与图表、布局设计、学习激励及动机等方面优化可读性非文本因素。
【Abstract】 Objective: To evaluate the readability of printed education materials regarding Systemic Lupus Erythematosus(SLE), and provide evidence for revising and developing printed education materials. Methods:The materials from hospitals in Hefei, Nanjing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Changsha were selected as assessment subjects. The text factors were evaluated by Chinese language difficulty coefficient. The non-text factors were evaluated by SAM. Results:A total of 50 materials of systemic lupus erythematosus plane health education materials were collected, the score of difficulty coefficient was(68.92±7.54); the total score of the SAM scale was(46.67±9.73), of which 20 materials were not applicable, 30 were applicable, and no material was rated very good, the highest score in the cultural suitability dimension(66.58±31.63), the lowest score in the illustration and chart dimension(22.43±16.18). Conclusion: SLE printed education materials don’t perform well in terms of readability. Health care providers should reduce the difficulty of reading and optimize non-text factors of readability from content, literacy demand, graphics, layout, and learning stimulation and motivation.
【Key words】 Health Education; Printed Material; Readability; Systemic Lupus Erythematosus;
- 【文献出处】 医学与社会 ,Medicine and Society , 编辑部邮箱 ,2020年08期
- 【分类号】R593.241;R193
- 【被引频次】2
- 【下载频次】228