【摘要】 [目的]验证多维疲劳量表(MFI-20)在我国大陆地区抑郁症病人中的信度和效度。[方法]将MFI-20量表中文版应用于177例抑郁症病人,以验证该量表的信度和效度。[结果]MFI-20量表各条目与总量表之间相关系数为0.494～0.790(P<0.01),探索性因子分析结果显示量表包含4个公因子,分别为体力疲乏、脑力疲乏、动力下降、活动减少,可累计解释方差的62.189%。MFI-20量表得分与健康状况调查简表(SF-36)、蒙哥马利艾斯博格抑郁量表(MADRS)得分显著相关(P<0.01)。量表总Cronbach′sα系数为0.916,各维度Cronbach′sα系数分别为0.894,0.887,0.700,0.622。1周后重测信度为0.632,各因子重测Pearson相关系数为0.468～0.694。[结论]中文版MFI-20量表在我国大陆地区抑郁症病人群体中具有较好的信度和效度,可作为抑郁症相关性疲乏的可靠性评估工具。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory(MFI-20) in depression patients in China’s mainland.Methods:The Chinese version of MFI-20 Scale was tested in 177 patients with depression to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale.Results:The correlation coefficiant between each item of the MFI-20 Scale and the total scale is 0.494～0.790(P<0.01).Exploratory factor analysis showed that the scale contained four common factors,including physical fatigue,mental fatigue,decreased motivation and decreased activity,which could accumulatively explain the variance of 62.189%.The scores of MFI-20 were significantly correlated with SF-36 and MADRS(P<0.01).The Cronbach′s α coefficient of the scale was 0.916,and the Cronbach′s α coefficient of each dimension was 0.894,0.887,0.700 and 0.622 respectively.The retest reliability was 0.632,and the pearson correletion coefficiant for each factor retest was 0.468～0.694 ofier one week.Conclusion:The Chinese version of MFI-20 Scale has good reliability and validity in the population of depressive patients in China’s mainland,and can be used as a reliability assessment tool for depression-related fatigue.更多还原