节点文献

浅析4套生理学教学问卷的信度与效度

Analysis onreliability and validity of 4 physiological teaching questionnaires

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 张金虎何亚萍张雪芹朱敏佳

【Author】 Zhang Jin-hu;HeYa-ping;Zhang Xue-qin;Zhu Min-jia;Department of Physiology, West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University;

【通讯作者】 朱敏佳;

【机构】 四川大学华西基础医学与法医学院生理学教研室

【摘要】 教学问卷是了解学生对教学活动意见建议的重要手段,需要对问卷收集信息的可靠性和项目设置的有效性进行评估。在对1999~2019间4套生理学教学问卷的信度与结构效度分析中,信度值0.688~0.887,问卷调查结果可靠;主成分贡献率60.2%~65.2%,项目设置还可优化。问卷整体质量较好,收集的信息价值较高。对生理学教学问卷进行质量控制分析,有助于正确评估学生反馈信息的价值,以便更好地发挥促进生理学教学质量提高的作用。

【Abstract】 Teaching questionnaire is an important means to understand students’ opinions and suggestions on teaching activities. It is necessary to evaluate the reliability of information collected by questionnaire and the effectiveness of project setting. In the reliability and structural validity analysis of four sets of physiology teaching questionnaires from 1999 to 2019, the reliability value is 0.688 ~ 0.887, the questionnaire survey results are reliable; the contribution rate of principal components is 60.2% ~ 65.2%, and the project setting can be optimized. The overall quality of the questionnaire is good, and the information collected is of high value. The quality control analysis of physiology teaching questionnaire is helpful to correctly evaluate the value of students’ feedback information, so as to play a better role in improving the quality of physiology teaching.

  • 【文献出处】 四川生理科学杂志 ,Sichuan Journal of Physiological Sciences , 编辑部邮箱 ,2020年04期
  • 【分类号】G642;R-4
  • 【下载频次】114
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络