节点文献

认罪认罚从宽制度的程序属性解读——从两个试点办法到《认罪认罚从宽制度的指导意见》的文本分析

Interpretation of Procedural Attributes of Leniency System of Admission of Guilty and Punishment——Textual Analysis from the Two pilot Approaches toGuidance on Leniency System of Admission of Guilty and Punishment

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 徐阳王崇

【Author】 XU Yang;WANG Chong;

【机构】 辽宁大学法学院

【摘要】 为保证认罪认罚从宽制度有效运行,有必要正确认识其程序属性。第一,程序嵌入性。认罪认罚从宽制度以嵌入的方式与既有的刑事诉讼程序衔接,形成了多元程序建构。第二,程序合意性。以政策引导、制度形塑替代利益驱使下的自然博弈,是认罪认罚从宽制度中合意机制的基本属性。第三,程序正当性。作为制度正当性基础的被追诉人认罪认罚从宽"自愿性"标准,具有认识要素和意志要素双重规范结构。认罚从宽以功利主义的逻辑去让渡刑罚权,对此更应该警惕无原则宽恕对实体正义产生的破坏性,应考虑以细致的实体规则及裁量标准,明确"从宽"的边界,促进刑罚适用的均衡。

【Abstract】 In order to guarantee the operation of leniency system of admission of guilty and punishment, theprocedural essence of the system should be recognized. First, it is procedural inlaying. The system inlays theprevious criminal procedure, forming multiple procedural structures. Second, it is procedural consensus. Thenatural game driven by policy guidance and system instead of interest is the basic attribute of the consensualmechanism in the system. Third,it is procedural legitimacy. The standard of voluntary admission of guilt andacceptance of punishment as the foundation of due process has double structures including the understandingand willing element. The system of lenient treatment for acceptance of punishment delivers punish power onutilitarian logic, to which should be alerted to destroy substantial justice by unreasonable lenient treatment.The precise substantial regulations and discretion standards should be concerned to define the border of"le-nient treatment"to promote equitably exercising punishment power.

【基金】 辽宁省特聘教授课题项目、辽宁省社科基金课题“刑事诉讼中无罪化裁量机制研究”
  • 【分类号】D925.2
  • 【被引频次】7
  • 【下载频次】610
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络