节点文献

重复经颅磁刺激对甲基苯丙胺依赖者的疗效及安全性

Efficacy and safety evaluation of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationthe in methamphetamine dependent patients

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 刘璐颖许华山焦东亮高贺程晓东王立金沐林林

【Author】 Liu Luying;Xu Huashan;Jiao Dongliang;Gao He;Cheng Xiaodong;Wang Lijin;Mu Linlin;School of Mental Health,Bengbu Medical College;Bengbu Compulsory Isolation and Rehabilitation Center;

【通讯作者】 许华山;

【机构】 蚌埠医学院精神卫生学院蚌埠强制隔离戒毒所

【摘要】 目的 探讨高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对甲基苯丙胺(MA)依赖者戒断后焦虑、抑郁及渴求的疗效及安全性评价。方法 采用随机对照研究,前瞻性选取蚌埠强制隔离戒毒所戒毒的男性MA依赖者47例,将所有被试者按随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组,研究组接受系统的高频(10 Hz)rTMS治疗,对照组接受rTMS的伪刺激治疗,每周3次,共治疗4周。在基线时和治疗第4周末分别应用焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)和视觉模拟标尺(VAS)评定患者的焦虑、抑郁和心理渴求情况,干预期间采用不良反应问卷记录出现的不良反应。结果 治疗第4周末,研究组SAS评分[(43.17±8.60)分]、SDS评分[(48.00±8.12)分]和 VAS评分[1.00(0,2.75)分]较基线时 SAS评分[(46.71± 8.64)分]、SDS评分[(52.96±7.66)分]和VAS评分[4.00(2.00,5.75)分]降低,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),且低于对照组[分别为(48.74±8.92)、(53.13±6.61)、4.00(0,6.00)分],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。对照组治疗第4周末SAS、SDS评分及VAS评分与基线时比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。研究组8例(33.33%)患者发生不良反应,其中头痛6例,头晕1例,耳鸣1例,患者均可耐受;对照组患者未发生不良反应事件。结论 高频rTMS可改善MA依赖者的焦虑、抑郁及渴求情况,轻微不良反应发生较为普遍。

【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS) in the treatment of post-withdrawal anxiety,depression and hunger in methamphetamine(MA) dependent patients.Methods A total of 47 cases of male MA dependent detoxification patients in Bengbu Compulsory Isolation and Rehabilitation Center were prospectively selected.All the subjects were divided into study group and control group according to the random number table method.The study group received systematic high-frequency(10 Hz) rTMS treatment,while the control group received sham rTMS treatment for 3 times a week and a total of 4 weeks.Self-rating Anxiety Scale(SAS),Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS) and Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) were used to assess anxiety,depression and psychological craving at baseline and at the end of the fourth week of treatment,respectively.Adverse drug reactions were recorded by adverse drug reactions questionnaire(ADR) during the intervention.Rusults At the end of the fourth week of treatment,SAS score(43.17± 8.60),SDS score(48.00± 8.12) and VAS score [1.00(0,2.75)]in the study group were lower than those at baseline [SAS score(46.71±8.64),SDS score(52.96± 7.66) and VAS score 4.00(2.00,5.75)] with statistically significant differences(all P<0.05).SAS score,SDS score and VAS score of the study group at the end of the fourth week of treatment were all lower than those of the control group [(48.74 ± 8.92),SDS scores(53.13 ± 6.61) and VAS scores 4.00(0,6.00)] with statistically significant differences(P <0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in SAS,SDS and VAS scores of the control group at the end of the fourth week compared with those at baseline(all P> 0.05).There were 8 cases(33.33%) of adverse reactions in the study group,including 6 cases of headache,1 case of dizziness and 1 case of tinnitus,which could be tolerated by the patients;no adverse reactions occurred in the control group.Conclusions High-frequency rTMS can improve the anxiety,depression and craving of methamphetaminedependent patients.Mild adverse reactions are common.

【基金】 蚌埠医学院研究生科研创新计划项目(Byycx1943);蚌埠医学院科技发展基金(BYKF1818);安徽高校自然科学研究重点项目(KJ2018A1017)~~
  • 【文献出处】 神经疾病与精神卫生 ,Journal of Neuroscience and Mental Health , 编辑部邮箱 ,2020年11期
  • 【分类号】R749.64
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络