节点文献
循证护理对心肌梗死并发心律失常患者抢救成功率及预后的影响研究
Study on the Effect of Evidence-based Nursing on the Rescue Success Rate and Prognosis of Patients with Myocardial Infarction Complicated with Arrhythmia
【摘要】 目的探究对心肌梗死并发心律失常患者实施循证护理的效果。方法随机选取2018年3月—2019年9月该院42例心肌梗死并发心律失常患者分为对照组(21例,应用常规护理)、实验组(21例,应用循证护理)。对比两组抢救成功率、住院时间、满意度评分、预后评分及并发症发生率。结果实验组抢救成功率(95.24%)高于对照组(90.48%),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而并发症发生率(4.76%)低于对照组(33.33%),差异有统计学意义(χ~2=3.860,P<0.05);实验组满意度评分、预后评分较对照组更高,且住院时间较对照组更短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对心肌梗死并发心律失常患者实施循证护理可有效增加抢救成功率,改善患者预后,可行性较高。
【Abstract】 Objective To explore the effect of evidence-based nursing for patients with myocardial infarction complicated by arrhythmia. Methods From March 2018 to September 2019, 42 patients with myocardial infarction and arrhythmia in the hospital were randomly selected divided into a control group(21 cases, with routine care) and an experimental group(21 cases, with evidence-based care). The rescue success rate, hospital stay, satisfaction score, prognosis score and complication rate were compared between the two groups. Results The rescue success rate of the experimental group(95.24%) was higher than that of the control group(90.48%), the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05), and the complication rate(4.76%) was lower than that of the control group(33.33%), the difference was statistically significant(χ~2=3.860, P<0.05); The satisfaction score and prognosis score of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group, and the hospital stay was shorter than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P <0.05). Conclusion The implementation of evidence-based care for patients with myocardial infarction and arrhythmia can effectively increase the success rate of rescue and improve the prognosis of patients, and it is feasible.
【Key words】 Myocardial infarction; Arrhythmia; Evidence-based nursing; Rescue success rate;
- 【文献出处】 中外医疗 ,China & Foreign Medical Treatment , 编辑部邮箱 ,2020年34期
- 【分类号】R473.5
- 【下载频次】15