节点文献

倾斜性农业保险扶贫政策的减贫效应及其差异

The poverty reduction effect and difference of poverty alleviation policy of preferential agricultural insurance

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 刘汉成陶建平

【Author】 LIU Hancheng;TAO Jianping;Business College, Huanggang Normal University;College of Economics & Management, Huazhong Agricultural University;

【机构】 黄冈师范学院商学院华中农业大学经济管理学院

【摘要】 基于2014—2018年"中国家庭追踪调查"数据,采用固定效应模型,实证检验了倾斜性农业保险扶贫政策的减贫效应。结果表明:倾斜性农业保险扶贫政策能够显著提高农村贫困户的收入水平;倾斜性农业保险扶贫政策对贫困户的脱贫效应存在差异,财政保费补贴比例、自缴保费减免比例和农业保险理赔金额对贫困户脱贫具有显著正向影响,而农业保险费率对贫困户脱贫的影响不显著;农村地区依然存在"一边脱贫、一边返贫"的现象,需要引起高度重视。

【Abstract】 Based on the data of "China Family Panel Studies" from 2014 to 2018, the poverty reduction effect of poverty alleviation policy of preferential agricultural insurance has been empirically tested by using the fixed effect model. The study shows that the poverty alleviation policy of preferential agricultural insurance has dramatically increased the income level of the poverty-stricken rural families. The poverty alleviation policy of preferential agricultural insurance has different poverty reduction effect: the proportion of financial premium subsidy, the proportion of self-payment premium reduction and the amount of agricultural insurance compensate have a significant positive impact on poverty alleviation of the rural poverty-stricken families, while the agricultural insurance rate has no significant effect on poverty alleviation. There is still the phenomenon of "getting out of poverty and returning back to poverty simultaneously", which deserves great attention.

【基金】 国家社会科学基金项目(19BJY116));国家自然科学基金项目(71773033)
  • 【文献出处】 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版) ,Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Social Sciences) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2020年06期
  • 【分类号】F323.8;F842.66
  • 【被引频次】9
  • 【下载频次】656
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络