节点文献

投喂模式对大菱鲆幼鱼生长及形态特征的影响

Effects of feeding pattern on growth and morphological characteristics of juvenile turbot Scophthalmus maximus

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 赵海涛胡智鑫万玉美孙桂清吴彦郭敏莉邓鹏春

【Author】 ZHAO Hai-tao;HU Zhi-xin;WAN Yu-mei;SUN Gui-qing;WU Yan;GUO Min-li;DENG Peng-chun;Hebei Key Laboratory of Marine Biological Resources and Environment;Ocean College,Hebei Agricultural University;Hebei Marine and Aquatic Science Research Institute;Langfang Municipal Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Affairs;

【通讯作者】 孙桂清;

【机构】 河北省海洋生物资源与环境重点实验室河北省海洋与水产科学研究院河北农业大学海洋学院河北省廊坊市农业农村局

【摘要】 为优化大菱鲆养殖管理、科学投喂,研究分析了禁食再投喂和循环禁食再投喂两种投喂模式对大菱鲆幼鱼(Scophthalmus maximus)生长及形态特征的影响。结果表明:循环禁食再投喂模式下,除肝体比外,循环禁食1 d投喂6 d(NS1F6)和循环禁食2 d投喂5 d(NS2F5)模式的生长指标与对照组(NS0组)无显著性差异(P>0.05),呈完全补偿生长。形态特征中NS2F5组体表增加面积和形态指标与NS0组无显著性差异(P>0.05),呈现完全补偿生长。NS1F6组大菱鲆幼鱼肝体比为(4.44±0.74)%,显著高于NS0组(P<0.05)。禁食再投喂模式下,禁食3 d投喂32 d(RS3F32)模式生长指标与对照组(RS0组)无显著性差异(P>0.05)呈现完全补偿生长。禁食9 d投喂26 d (RS9F26)模式的生长指标除肝体比外,均高于RS0组且无显著性差异(P>0.05),其肝体比为(3.41±0.22)%,显著高于对照组(P<0.05),呈完全补偿生长。形态学指标中RS9F26组体表增加面积和形体指标和对照组无显著性差异(P>0.05),呈现完全补偿生长。

【Abstract】 In order to optimize the management of turbot farming and scientific feeding, the effects of fasting and refeeding on the growth and morphology of Scophthalmus maximus were analyzed. The results showed that the growth indices of circulate fasting for 1 d and refeeding for 6 d mode(NS1 F6)and circulate fasting for 2 d and refeeding for 5 d mode(NS2 F5) were not significantly different from control group(NS0)(P>0.05) in the model of cyclic fasting refeeding except for the liver body ratio. There was no significant difference between the NS2 F5 body surface and the control group in the morphological features(P>0.05), showing a total compensatory growth. The liver body ratio of the young turbot in NS1 F6 group(4.44±0.74)% was significantly higher than that in NS0 group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the growth index of fasting for 3 d and refeeding for 32 d(RS3 F32) group and that of RS0 group(P>0.05), which showed completely compensated growth. Fasting for 9 d and refeeding for 26 d(RS9 F26) model was higher than that of control group except liver body ratio, but there was no significant difference(P>0.05), and the ratio of liver to body(3.41±0.22)% was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the area and body size of RS9 F26 between the control group and the control group(P>0.05), which manifested as completely compensatory growth.

【基金】 现代农业产业技术体系专项经费资助(CARS-47-Z2);河北省现代农业产业技术体系特色海产品创新团队海水鱼岗专项经费资助
  • 【分类号】S917.4
  • 【被引频次】1
  • 【下载频次】140
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络