节点文献
乳腺癌患者心理韧性与负性情绪的相关性
Correlation between psychological resilience and negative emotions in breast cancer patients
【摘要】 目的研究乳腺癌患者心理韧性与负性情绪的相关性。方法选择本院2016年11月~2019年11月收治的150例乳腺癌患者作为研究对象,采取心理弹性量表(CD-RISC)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、中文版患者恐惧疾病进展简化量表(FoP-Q-SF)对患者进行调查,并用Pearson直线相关法分析CD-RISC与HAMA、HAMD、FoP-Q-SF的相关性。结果 150例乳腺癌患者的CD-RISC评分为(57.43±6.82)分。HAMA≤28分者的CD-RISC评分高于HAMA>28分者,HAMD≤24分者的CD-RISC评分高于HAMD>24分者,FoP-Q-SF≤30分者的CD-RISC评分高于FoP-Q-SF>30分者,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经Pearson直线相关法分析,CD-RISC与HAMA、HAMD、FoP-Q-SF均呈负相关。结论乳腺癌患者心理韧性与负性情绪相关,临床工作中可通过提高患者的心理韧性来降低负性情绪。
【Abstract】 Objective To study the correlation between psychological resilience and negative emotions in breast cancer patients. Methods A total of 150 patients with breast cancer from November 2016 to November 2019 in our hospital selected as the research object. The psychological resilience scale(CD-RISC),Hamilton anxiety scale(HAMA),Hamilton depression scale(HAMD),Chinese version of the patient fear disease progress scale(FoP-Q-SF)were used to investigate the patients,and Pearson linear correlation method was used to analyze the correlation between CD-RISC and HAMA,HAMD and FoP-Q-SF. Results The CD-RISC score of 150 breast cancer patients was(57.43±6.82). The CD-RISC score of HAMA ≤ 28 points was higher than that of HAMA>28 points,and the CD-RISC score of HAMD ≤ 24 points was higher than that of HAMD>24 points. The CD-RISC score of FoP-Q-SF ≤ 30 points was higher than that of FoP-Q-SF>30 points,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). According to the analysis of Pearson line correlation method,CD-RISC was negatively correlated with HAMA,HAMD,and FoP-QSF. Conclusion The psychological resilience of breast cancer patients is related to negative emotions. We can reduce the negative emotions of patients through improving their psychological resilience.
【Key words】 Breast cancer; Psychological resilience; Anxiety; Depression; Fear;
- 【文献出处】 国际精神病学杂志 ,Journal of International Psychiatry , 编辑部邮箱 ,2020年06期
- 【分类号】R473.73
- 【被引频次】4
- 【下载频次】199