节点文献
信息库软件智能生成报告的著作权分析——“菲林诉百度案”引发的思考
Copyright Analysis of Intelligent Generation Reports of Information Database Software——Thoughts Caused by “Filin v. Baidu Case”
【摘要】 在科技日新月异不断进步的当下,人工智能正在让世界发生着前所未有的巨大变化。"北京菲林律师事务所诉百度百家号案"被媒体称为全国首例人工智能生成内容著作权案。涉案文章是否涉及人工智能创造,法院在审理中只字未提。人工智能可分为强人工智能与弱人工智能,现阶段的人工智能还处于弱人工智能阶段,在大多数情况下,对人工智能生成内容法律性质的判断及是否纳入著作权保护,与其由人工智能生成的这一事实并无关系,其是否可受版权保护更适宜运用现有的有关法律标准进行衡量。
【Abstract】 With the rapid development of science and technology,unprecedented changes take place in artificial intelligence. "Beijing Film Law Firm v. Baidu Baijiahao Case"is known by the media as the first case of AI generated content copyright in China. Whether the articles involved in the case really involve AI creation is not mentioned by the court in the trial. AI can be divided into strong AI and weak AI. At present,AI is still at the weak AI stage.In most cases,the judgment of the legal nature of AI generated content and whether it is included in copyright protection have nothing to do with the fact that the content is generated by AI. It is more suitable to use the existing relevant legal standards to measure whether it should be protected by copyright.
- 【文献出处】 长春大学学报 ,Journal of Changchun University , 编辑部邮箱 ,2020年11期
- 【分类号】D923.41
- 【被引频次】1
- 【下载频次】449