节点文献

生计资本视角下土地整治绩效满意度研究——以四川省冉义镇为例

Study on Farmers’ Satisfaction with Land Consolidation Performance from the Perspective of Livelihood Capital: A Case Study of Ranyi Town, Sichuan Province

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 陈甜倩冯喆崔永亮赵华甫

【Author】 CHEN Tianqian;FENG Zhe;CUI Yongliang;ZHAO Huafu;School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences;College of Management and Science, Chengdu University of Technology;

【通讯作者】 冯喆;

【机构】 中国地质大学(北京)土地科学技术学院成都理工大学管理科学学院

【摘要】 为评估土地整治绩效满意度,选取四川省邛崃市冉义镇为研究区,通过问卷调查和访谈获取数据。依据职业,将农户划分为纯农业、以农为主兼业、以非农为主兼业及非农业4种生计类型,从人力资本、自然资本、物质资本、金融资本和社会资本5个方面构建生计资本测算表,对土地整治区不同生计类型的农户生计资本现状进行评价。基于测算结果,考察土地整治对农户满意度的影响,并采用Probit模型分析满意度的影响因素。结果表明:1)农户生计资本略失衡,社会资本和物质资本值较高,金融资本与人力资本值较低;2)农户对土地整治工程的满意度总体上较高,自然资本、物质资本、社会资本和收入来源变化等因素对满意度产生积极影响,教育程度、金融资本和生计活动开支对非农类型农户的满意度产生消极影响。

【Abstract】 In order to evaluate the satisfaction of land consolidation performance, Ranyi Town in Qionglai City, Sichuan Province was selected as the study area, and the data were obtained through questionnaires and interviews. According to the occupation, the farmers were divided into four types: pure agriculture, agriculturebased, non-agricultural-based and non-agricultural. The livelihood capital estimation table was constructed from five aspects: human capital, natural capital, physical capital, financial capital and social capital to evaluate the current status of the livelihood capital of farmers with different livelihood types in the land consolidation area. Based on the calculation results, the impact of land consolidation on farmer satisfaction was investigated, and the Probit model was used to analyze the influencing factors of satisfaction. The results show that the farmer’s livelihood capital is slightly out of balance, the social capital and material capital value are higher, and the financial capital and human capital value are lower. Farmers generally have higher satisfaction with land consolidation projects. Factors such as natural capital, physical capital, social capital, and income sources have a positive impact on satisfaction; education, financial capital, and livelihood activities have a negative impact on non-agricultural farmers’ satisfaction.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金(41901261,41771204);北京市社会科学基金(19GLC056,18GLB043);中央高校基本科研业务费(2652017100)资助
  • 【文献出处】 北京大学学报(自然科学版) ,Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis , 编辑部邮箱 ,2020年02期
  • 【分类号】F321.1;D422.6
  • 【被引频次】10
  • 【下载频次】457
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络