【摘要】 与其他学科相比,思想史的"全球转向"相对滞后,这与其自身的研究特点和学科传统有一定关系。从现有的全球思想史研究来看,"全球转向"无论对于改变传统思想史的局限、拓展研究领域,以及回应全球化时代所带来的新命题,都具有相对积极的意义。全球思想史首先是一种跨文化研究,其作用主要扮演了解构的角色,但它是通过建构多重主体性与多中心的方式来消解单一文化中心主义的,并在此基础之上试图重建一个去中心化的宏大叙事结构。因而,宏大叙事又表现出全球思想史建构性的一面。这双重内涵可以说是当前全球思想史研究方法的主要架构。在思想史与全球史的有机结合过程中,一方面思想史可以有效弥补全球史中的观念、文化等非物质因素的缺位,另一方面全球史的空间转向则有望修正思想史长期忽略空间概念的问题,给予人类的观念形态以更加富有纵深感、互动性和关联性的阐释。更多还原

【Abstract】 Compared with other disciplines,the"global turn"of the intellectual history lags relatively behind,which is related to its research features and discipline traditions. The global intellectual history is in its first place a cross-cultural study and mainly plays a role of deconstruction. However,it dissolves the ethnocentrism by way of establishing multiple parts and attempts to reconstruct a grant narrative structure of decentralization. Therefore,the grant narrative shows the constructive side of the global intellectual history. The double connotations are the main framework of research methods in the global intellectual history at present. As for the combination of the intellectual history and the global history,on the one hand,the intellectual history can be useful to cover the absence of immaterial factors like concepts and culture in the global history; on the other hand,the spatial turn of the global history is expected to correct the issue of ignoring the spatial concept in the intellectual history for a long time and provide more profound,interactive and relevant interpretations for the ideology of human.更多还原