节点文献

单孔加一孔联合ERAS在高位直肠及乙状结肠癌中的应用

Application of “single-incision plus one” combined with ERAS for upper rectal and sigmoid colon cancer

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 滕文浩魏丞姜雯雯肖军臧卫东

【Author】 TENG Wen-hao;WEI Cheng;JIANG Wen-wen;XIAO Jun;ZANG Wei-dong;Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital;Fujian Provincial Reproductive Medicine Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children’s Hospital of Fujian Medical University;

【通讯作者】 臧卫东;

【机构】 福建省肿瘤医院/福建医科大学附属肿瘤医院胃肠肿瘤外科福建医科大学附属福建省妇幼保健院/福建省生殖医学中心

【摘要】 目的探讨单孔加一孔腹腔镜手术联合ERAS治疗高位直肠及乙状结肠癌的近期疗效。方法回顾性分析2017年11月至2018年10月在福建省肿瘤医院胃肠肿瘤外科进行加速康复外科干预的92例高位直肠及乙状结肠癌患者资料,根据手术方式的不同,分为单孔加一孔手术联合快速康复外科组39例及常规腹腔镜手术联合ERAS组53例,对比两组围术期情况。结果两组患者基线资料无明显统计学差异(P> 0.05),且在手术时间、出血量、上下切缘、清扫淋巴结数量及并发症方面无明显统计学差异(P> 0.05)。但单孔加一孔手术联合ERAS组较常规手术联合ERAS组,总切口长度更短[(6.7±1.1)cm比(8.5±1.3)cm,P=0.000],术后首次下床时间更早[(22.2±5.2)h比(27.1±7.9)h,P=0.001],首次排便时间更早[(70.2±19.8)h比(83.1±20.4)h,P=0.005],术后第一天C反应蛋白值更低[(43.5±28.6)mg/L比(57.2±33.2)mg/L,P=0.038],术后住院时间更短[(7.0±1.7)d比(8.1±2.1)d,P=0.010],且术后2~4天疼痛评分更低(P <0.05)。结论经验丰富的腔镜医师采用单孔加一孔手术治疗高位直肠及乙状结肠癌并联合ERAS干预是安全可行的,且单孔加一孔手术可减低操作难度,具有疼痛轻、术后恢复快等优势,值得临床推广。

【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery(SILS+1) combined with enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) for upper rectal and sigmoid colon cancer. Methods A retrospective analysis on 92 cases of upper rectal and sigmoid colon cancer patients who were undergone enhanced recovery after surgery was performed. According to the different operation methods, they were divided into two groups, SILS+1 combined with ERAS group(39 patients) and conventional laparoscopic surgery(CLS) combined with ERAS group(53 patients). Then the perioperative data would be compared. Results The two groups were well balanced with respect to the baseline characteristics(P>0.05). There were no significant difference in operating time, bleeding, resection margin, number of retrieved lymph nodes and morbidity(P>0.05). However, as compared to the CLSERAS group, patients in SILS+1-ERAS group had a smaller incision [(6.7±1.1)cm vs.(8.5±1.3)cm, P=0.000], shorter time to first ambulation [(22.2±5.2)h vs.(27.1±7.9)h, P=0.001], shorter time of bowel movement [(70.2±19.8)h vs.(83.1±20.4)h, P=0.005], lower C-reaction protein in the first day [(43.5±28.6)mg/L vs.(57.2±33.2)mg/L, P=0.038] and shorter time of postoperative hospital stay[(7.0±1.7)d vs.(8.1±2.1)d, P=0.010]. Moreover, the visual analogue scale(VAS) scores were lower from 2 to 4 days after operation in SILS+1-ERAS group(P<0.05). Conclusions For experienced laparoscopic surgeons, it is safe and reproducible in single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery combined with ERAS for upper rectal and sigmoid colon cancer. The technical of SILS+1 could reduce the difficulty of operation and postoperative pain, promote postoperative rehabilitation. So it is worthy of clinical promotion.

【基金】 卫计委国家临床重点专科建设资助项目(卫办医政函[2012]649号);福建省医学创新课题(2015-CXB-7)
  • 【文献出处】 肿瘤代谢与营养电子杂志 ,Electronic Journal of Metabolism and Nutrition of Cancer , 编辑部邮箱 ,2019年01期
  • 【分类号】R735.3
  • 【被引频次】4
  • 【下载频次】57
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络