节点文献

认罪认罚从宽制度的根基、困惑与走向

The Root,Confusion and Direction of the Leniency System for Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishment

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 吕泽华杨迎泽

【Author】 Lü Zehua;Yang Yingze;Ocean University of China;National Prosecutors College of P. R. C.;

【机构】 中国海洋大学法学院国家检察官学院

【摘要】 认罪认罚从宽制度完善改革离不开刑事司法理念上的革新与发展:分配正义、宽严相济刑事政策、诉讼效率、诉讼认识论、实用主义等可为其提供理论、政策支撑;但也会产生与罪刑相适应、无罪推定、实体真实诉讼目的、反对强迫自证其罪等基本理论原则的冲突问题,并有解构诉讼构造、消弭法官独立调查事实的可能性;可从坚守罪刑相适应原则基本内涵,依靠罪刑法定、证据裁判、反对强迫自证其罪原则,确保审判中心主义改革要义等方面实现理论协调与发展。

【Abstract】 The reform of the leniency system for pleading guilty and accepting punishment cannot be made without the innovation and development of the criminal justice philosophy. Theories such as the distributive Justice,the criminal policy of strict with leniency,the lawsuit efficiency,the epistemology of litigation,and the pragmatic judicial philosophy can provide theoretical support for the leniency system. On the other hand,the development of the leniency system can conflict with some basic theoretical principles,such as suiting punishment to crime,presumption of innocence,anti-self-incrimination and so on. It also has the possibility of deconstructing the litigation structure and eliminating the judge’s independence in investigating facts. We should stick to the fundamental connotation of the principle of suiting punishment to crime,strictly comply with the principle of legality,evidentiary adjudication,and against self-incrimination. We should guarantee the implementation of judgment centralism to realize the theoretical coordination and development of the leniency system on admission of guilty and acceptance of punishment.

【基金】 2017年度山东省社会科学基金项目(审判专项课题)“认罪认罚从宽制度完善的理论辨析与发展”(17CSPJ13);中国海洋大学科研启动基金课题:“认罪认罚从宽制度的中国品性研究”(861801013190)的成果
  • 【文献出处】 国家检察官学院学报 ,Journal of National Prosecutors College , 编辑部邮箱 ,2019年03期
  • 【分类号】D925.2
  • 【被引频次】28
  • 【下载频次】2043
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络