节点文献

纸笔重复法与空书法对英语单词学习效果的对比研究

Differential Effects of Paper-and-pen Writing and Air Writing on English Vocabulary Acquisition

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 李旭奎李晓婷于丽闫海娟

【Author】 Li Xukui;Li Xiaoting;Yu Li;Yan Haijuan;College of Foreign Languages,Ocean University of China;

【机构】 中国海洋大学外国语学院

【摘要】 本研究探讨了纸笔重复法与空书法对英语词汇学习的影响。研究以山东某实验中学的两个平行班共80名初三学生为被试,两个班分别通过纸笔重复法和空书法记忆英语单词。通过收集、分析即时测试和一周后的延时测试数据,发现:(1)中国初中生可以通过纸笔重复法与空书法学习英语单词;(2)在英语词汇辨认及英语词汇回忆方面,纸笔重复法与空书法对英语词汇记忆的影响并无显著差异;(3)在英语词汇辨认及英语词汇回忆方面,纸笔重复法与空书法对英语词汇保持的影响并无显著差异。本研究为中国英语词汇教学提供了启示。

【Abstract】 This study explores possible differential effects of paper-and-pen writing and air writing on English vocabulary memorization and retention.Eighty eighth-grade students from two classes of an experimental middle school in Shandong Province were selected as subjects.The two classes were taught to memorize nine English words through paper-and-pen writing and air writing respectively.Their answers in an immediate posttest and a delayed posttest were collected and scored for accuracy.Analysis of the data shows that:(1)Chinese middle school students can acquire English words both through paper-and-pen writing and through air writing;(2)there is no significant difference in the effect between paper-and-pen writing and air writing on English vocabulary memorization,measured either by a vocabulary recall task or by a vocabulary recognition task;(3)there is no significant difference in the effect between paper-and-pen writing and air writing on English vocabulary retention,measured either by a vocabulary recall task or by a vocabulary recognition task.The results of this study have some implications for the teaching of English vocabulary in China.

【基金】 山东省人文社科研究计划经费项目“中介语书面语篇体裁的负迁移研究(J16WC50)”
  • 【文献出处】 中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版) ,Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2019年01期
  • 【分类号】G633.41
  • 【被引频次】1
  • 【下载频次】229
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络