节点文献

妊娠期糖尿病不同治疗方式对妊娠结局的影响

Effect of different treatment methods of gestational diabetes on the outcome of pregnancy

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 刘欢杨锦龙张晋徐锐李慧杨琴张知文

【Author】 Liu Huan;Yang Jinlong;Zhang Jin;The People’s Hospital of Leshan City;

【通讯作者】 张晋;

【机构】 乐山市人民医院

【摘要】 目的探讨妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)孕妇不同治疗方式对妊娠结局的影响。方法选择2017年4月—2018年6月我院产前检查发现的妊娠期糖尿病孕妇213例,分为生活方式干预组(A组)和胰岛素治疗组(B组),再根据血糖控制是否达标又分别分为血糖达标组与不达标组,选取同期1 113例血糖正常孕妇作为对照组,比较各组妊娠结局及母儿并发症的差异。结果 A组血糖控制不达标孕妇剖宫产、羊水过多、早产、巨大儿、胎儿生长受限、新生儿低血糖及新生儿转儿科的发生率均高于本组血糖达标孕妇及对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);B组血糖控制不达标孕妇剖宫产、羊水过多、胎膜早破、早产、巨大儿、新生儿低血糖及新生儿转儿科的发生率均高于本组血糖达标孕妇及对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论不论GDM孕妇仅采用生活方式控制还是联合胰岛素治疗,当血糖控制不达标时,剖宫产、羊水过多、早产、巨大儿、新生儿低血糖及新生儿转儿科的发生率均增加,而孕期血糖控制达标可显著降低不良妊娠结局的发生率。

【Abstract】 Objective The curative effect ofdifferent treatment methods on pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM). Methods Total of 213 pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus have done the antenatal examination in our hospital from April 2017 to June 2018,and then divided into lifestyle intervention group(group A)and insulin treatment group(group B). Based on the result of blood glucosebelow or up to the standard value,the patients were divided into two groups:the standard group and the substandard group. In the same period,1113 pregnant women with normal glycemicwere selected as the control group,to comparethe differences of each group in pregnancy outcome and maternal and fetal complications. Results The incidences of cesarean section,oligohydramnios,pretermdelivery,macrosomia,fetalgrowth restriction,neonatalhypoglycemiaand neonatalconversion to pediatrics in GDM women with substandard glycemic control in group A were higher than those in group A with standard glycemic and control group. The results determine statistically significant(P<0.05). The incidences of cesarean section,oligohydramnios,premature rupture of membranes,premature delivery,macrosomia,neonatal hypoglycemia and neonatal conversion to pediatrics in GDM women with substandard glycemiccontrol in group B were higher than those in group B with standard glycemic and control group. The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion The clinic outcome illustrates that whether GDM pregnant women only took lifestyle intervention or combined insulin treatment,when glycemic control is substandard,the incidence of cesarean section,oligohydramnios,preterm delivery,macrosomia,neonatal hypoglycemia and neonatal conversion to pediatrics increased. Nevertheless,When the glycemic control up to standard during pregnancy,the incidence ofadverse outcome ofpregnancy can be significantly reduced.

【基金】 2017四川省卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题(17PJ383)
  • 【文献出处】 基层医学论坛 ,The Medical Forum , 编辑部邮箱 ,2019年28期
  • 【分类号】R714.256
  • 【被引频次】10
  • 【下载频次】199
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络