【摘要】 20世纪末以来,新闻传播学研究的民族志进路愈发清晰,但对于民族志与新闻传播学知识生产的全球图景却缺少系统地实证研究。基于此,本文通过对1989—2018年间发表于SSCI期刊之上的230篇文献的知识计量学研究发现,直到2004年前后,民族志与新闻传播学知识生产才出现指数级增长态势;主要围绕与互联网相关的核心议题展开,其中culture、public、production、technology等是主要被解释变量。与男性主导的学术偏向不同,在该领域知识生产中女性略微多于男性;全球范围来看,美国和欧洲表现出蓬勃的学术生产景象,而以非洲为代表的欠发达地区则成为"学术贫困地带";在科际合作上,独著大约是合著的2倍多,合著作者的学科背景共涉及社会学、教育学、计算机科学等13个学科领域。这些研究发现,一定程度上折射出民族志进路在新闻传播学知识生产中具有较强潜力。更多还原

【Abstract】 Since the end of the 20^th century, the ethnographic approach to journalism and communication has become clearer and clearer, but the global picture of knowledgeproduction in ethnography and Journalism and communication lacks systematic empirical research. Based on this, this paper studies 230 papers published in SSCI journals from 1989 to 2018 and finds that the knowledge production of ethnography and journalism has not increased exponentially until around 2004, which mainly focuses on the core issues related to the Internet, including culture, public, technology and so on are the main explanatory variables. Unlike the male-dominated academic bias, there are slightly more women than men in this area of knowledge production; globally, the United States and Europe have shown a thriving picture of academic production, while the less developed regions represented by Africa have become "academic poverty zones"; in international cooperation, monographs are about twice as many as co-authors. The author’s academic background covers 13 disciplines including sociology, pedagogy, computer science and so on. These findings reflect to a certain extent that ethnography has a strong potential in the production of journalistic knowledge.更多还原