节点文献

宰后僵直过程中猪肉保水性变化及冷却工艺优化

Water holding capacity change of pork during rigor and optimization of cooling process

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 黄明焜易永红龙达嘉金桩王枫孙为正孙志昶

【Author】 HUANG Mingkun;YI Yonghong;LONG Dajia;JIN Zhuang;WANG Feng;SUN Weizheng;SUN Zhichang;Luoniushan Co., Ltd.;Hainan Luoniushan Foods Group Co.;School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology;

【通讯作者】 孙志昶;

【机构】 罗牛山股份有限公司海南罗牛山食品集团有限公司华南理工大学食品科学与工程学院

【摘要】 为研究宰后僵直过程中冷却速度对猪肉保水性的影响,解决实际生产中对僵直期猪肉缺乏相应冷却工艺标准的问题。以二元杂交猪为对象,宰后猪肉分别在(1±1)、(4±1)、(7±1)℃冷却0、2、4、6、8、10、12、14、16 h,测定不同条件下通脊肌肉的温度、pH、汁液损失和水分分布,分析僵直期猪肉适宜的冷却时间,并通过正交试验对冷却工艺参数进行优化。结果表明:宰后僵直过程中,汁液损失先减小后增大,在8 h达到最低值,冷却速率越大p H降低速度越缓慢,冷却(1214)h后p H趋于稳定且汁液损失无显著性变化(P>0.05),即冷却(1214)h后达到僵直后期;结合水(pT21)和自由水(pT23)含量先减小后增大,不易流动水(pT22)先增大后减小,冷却速率对结合水含量的变化影响不显著(P>0.05),但对不易流动水和自由水含量的变化影响显著(P<0.05),冷却速率越大不易流动水含量越高,而自由水含量越低;最优冷却工艺参数为冷却时间13 h、库温(4±1)℃、风速1 m/s、湿度90%,与常规冷却工艺相比,最优冷却工艺显著提高了猪肉保水性(P<0.05),但与两段式冷却工艺相比差异不显著(P>0.05)。

【Abstract】 In order to study the effect of cooling rate on the water holding capacity of pork during postmortem rigor, the problem of the lack of cooling technology standard in actual production was solved. Taking Landrace×Large white pigs as the research object, the pork was stored at(1±1),(4±1),(7±1)℃for 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 h and 16 h to determine the temperature of the muscle, pH, juice loss and water distribution. The optimum cooling time of pork in rigor period was analyzed, and the parameters of cooling process were optimized by orthogonal test. The results showed that in the process of rigor, the juice loss decreased first and then increased, and reached the lowest value at 8 h. The higher the cooling rate was, the slower the pH decreased. The pH value tended to be stable and the juice loss didn’t change significantly after cooling for(1214)h(P>0.05), therefore, the pork reached the later stage of rigor after cooling for(1214)h. The content of combined water(pT21) and free water(pT23) decreased first and then increases, while that the immobilized water(pT22) increased first and then decreased. The effect of cooling rate on the change of combined water content wasn’t significant(P>0.05), but it had a significant effect on the change of free water content and immobilized water content(P<0.05). Therefore, with the increase of cooling rate, the content of immobilized water was higher, and the content of free water was lower. The optimum cooling process parameters were as follows: cooling time 13 h, cooling temperature(4±1) ℃, wind speed 1 m/s, humidity 90%. Compared with conventional cooling process, the optimum cooling process significantly improved the water holding capacity of pork(P<0.05), but the difference was not significant compared with rapid chilling method(P>0.05).

【基金】 海南省人社厅2017年博士后项目
  • 【文献出处】 食品科技 ,Food Science and Technology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2019年01期
  • 【分类号】TS251.51
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】285
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络