【摘要】 通过对一个学位规制研究样本的发生机制考察,阐明须厘清认定学术不端行为的适格主体,避免简单以行政手段处置学术事务所产生的不足。将所查论文重合率结果交由学术专家,对其评阅的学位论文从论文学术文字内容及学术思想两个方面是否存在抄袭剽窃行为进行学术认定或转化为论文评审得分。有效区别于《著作权法》之思想与表达二分法原则——将思想排除在法律保护的范围之外,形成符合学术规范的对学术思想独创要求的要件特征,补充完善一直以来对学术思想抄袭剽窃的认知不足,形成具有学术独有征象的,具备可操作性的,逾越著作权法而独立存在特性的学术思想规范。更多还原

【Abstract】 By observing the mechanics of academic degree regulations, the writer of this article articulates that the person under investigation should be well considered before being sentenced to avoid bluntly using administrative means in dealing with academic problems. Whether the thesis under investigation has a standard rate of similarity should be determined by an academic specialist. The act of plagiarism should be solved on a more fair and equal basis. It differs from the Copyright Law as well as from the Multiple Dichotomies Method. Thoughts and presentation can be separated to avoid the neglected legal right of thoughts. A code of conduct that is more suitable for the academic environment should be formed. Thus independent operational academic code of conduct that is not affected by the Copyright Law can be formed.更多还原