节点文献

ERCC1基因多态性与胰腺导管腺癌易感性的Meta分析

Association between ERCC1 gene polymorphisms and risk of pancreatic cancer:a Metaanalysis

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 吴飏张纯陆子鹏蒋奎荣张晓艳

【Author】 Wu Yang;Zhang Chun;Lu Zipeng;Jiang Kuirong;Zhang Xiaoyan;Department of General,Visceral and Transplantation Surgery,Ludwig-Maximilians University;Pancreas Center,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University;Department of Hematology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University;

【通讯作者】 张晓艳;

【机构】 慕尼黑大学附属医院外科南京医科大学第一附属医院胰腺中心南京医科大学第一附属医院血液科

【摘要】 目的:探讨切除修复交叉互补基因1(excision repair cross complementing 1,ERCC1)2种最常见的基因多态性(rs3212986、rs11615)与胰腺导管腺癌(pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,PDAC)患病风险的相关性。方法:检索PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、中国知网文献数据库,查找国内外关于ERCC1多态性(rs3212986、rs11615)与PDAC易感性关系的病例对照研究。由2名评价者根据纳入标准分别独立筛选文献并提取数据后,采用Stata12.0软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入8项病例对照研究,其中ERCC1 rs3212986纳入4项研究共1 934例患者,rs11615纳入4项研究共2 547例患者。结果显示,ERCC1rs3212986可显著提高人群PDAC的患病风险(CA vs. AA:OR=1.34,95%CI:1.11~1.63;CC vs. AA:OR=2.33,95%CI:1.73~3.14;AC+CC vs. AA:OR=1.50,95%CI:1.25~1.80;CC vs. CA+AA:OR=1.98,95%CI:1.50~2.62;C vs. A:OR=1.45,95%CI:1.27~1.66);而ERCC1 rs11615则与PDAC患病风险无关(CT vs. TT:OR=1.02,95%CI:0.87~1.21;CC vs. TT:OR=1.21;95%CI:0.93~1.56;TC+CC vs. TT:OR=1.06,95%CI:0.91~1.24;CC vs. CT+TT:OR=1.20,95%CI:0.94~1.53;C vs. T:OR=1.08,95%CI:0.96~1.21)。结论:ERCC1 rs3212986可明显增加PDAC发病风险,rs11615则与PDAC易感性无关。

【Abstract】 Objective:This study aims to assess the association between excision repair cross complementing 1(ERCC1)gene polymorphisms(rs3212986、rs11615)and susceptibility to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Methods:Evidence for this association was obtained by searching PubMed,Web of Science,EMBASE and CNKI. Data were extracted using standardized forms and odds ratios(ORs)with 95% confidence intervals(CIs)were used to assess the strength of association. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12.0. Results:Eight studies were enrolled in our final combined analysis. The results showed evidence for significant association between rs3212986 polymorphism and PDAC risk(CA vs. AA:OR=1.34,95% CI:1.11-1.63;CC vs. AA:OR=2.33,95% CI:1.73-3.14;AC+CC vs. AA:OR=1.50,95% CI:1.25-1.80;CC vs. CA+AA:OR=1.98,95% CI:1.50-2.62;C vs. A:OR=1.45,95% CI:1.27-1.66).However,no association was observed between rs11615 and PDAC risk(CT vs. TT:OR=1.02,95% CI:0.87-1.21;CC vs. TT:OR=1.21;95% CI:0.93-1.56;TC+CC vs. TT:OR=1.06,95% CI:0.91-1.24;CC vs. CT+TT:OR=1.20,95% CI:0.94-1.53;C vs. T:OR=1.08,95%CI:0.96-1.21). Conclusion:The allele gene C of ERCC rs3212986 is significantly associated with the risk of PDAC,while rs11615 might not contribute to the risk of PDAC.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81871980);江苏省科技厅临床前沿技术(BE2016788);医学重点人才(ZDRCB2016004);国家重点研究计划-973计划(2016J6)
  • 【文献出处】 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版) ,Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Natural Sciences) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2019年06期
  • 【分类号】R735.9
  • 【被引频次】1
  • 【下载频次】101
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络