【摘要】 在霍尔、奈格里和亚瑟对《〈1857-1858年经济学手稿〉导言》的诠释中,结构、历史和逻辑的张力表现得异常突出。霍尔主要采用阿尔都塞的结构因果观和德里达解构哲学的一般策略,最终将马克思的方法论改造成一种有机融合结构主义、历史主义和后结构主义原则的调和模式。奈格里基本遵循德勒兹差异哲学的后结构主义思路,将它理解为一个基于差异性、建构性和非连续性的主体性和内在性模式。亚瑟则旨在实现马克思辩证法的彻底黑格尔化,将它解释成一种重建概念结构之体系总体的逻辑本体论。从根本上看,三者都不可避免地违背了马克思科学方法论的基本原则。更多还原

【Abstract】 There is an intense tension among structure,history and logic in Hall,Negri and Arthur’s different reading about 1857 Introduction. Hall mainly uses the general tactics of Althusser’s structural causality and Derrida’s deconstructive philosophy. He transforms Marx’s methodology into a reconciliatory mode which organically integrates structuralism,historicism and post-structuralism. Negri basically follows the post-structuralist approach of Deleuze’s difference philosophy and reconstructs it as the subjective and immanent mode based on difference,constitutivity and discontinuity. Arthur attempts to realize radical Hegelianization of Marx’s dialectics and interprets it as the logic ontology aimed to reconstruct the systematic totality of conceptual structure. Fundamentally,they all violate the basic principles of Marx’s scientific methodology.更多还原