【摘要】 选取S大学2017届411份"差评"研究生学位论文盲审专家评阅意见,采用质性研究词频统计方法及文献编码方法分析"差评"论文评阅意见。发现其主要存在研究主题不明确、逻辑结构混乱、论证分析方法不当、结论不实与建议泛化、写作不规范、写作态度不端正、创新性缺乏等七个特征。并进一步将七个特征归结为对研究生学位论文学科性、规范性、学理型、实用性、创新性的要求。既为学位论文过程管理中鉴别"差评"学位论文提供了参考,也为优化学位论文质量评价体系提供了新思路和新方法。更多还原

【Abstract】 The S-University’s 2017 "bad review" graduate degree theses are reviewed by experts based on blind-commentary, among which 411 papers are picked out. Qualitative research on word frequency statistics and literature coding methods are used to analyze the opinions on these dissertations. By the analysis, it is believed that the "bad evaluation" postgraduate theses have seven characteristics: unclear research theme, disordered logical structure, improper analysis and argumentation method, unrealistic conclusions, irregular writing, poor writing attitudes and lack of innovation. And we further categorize the seven aspects into the requirements of discipline, normative, academic, practical and innovative for graduate degree thesis. It provides a reference for the identification of "bad review" dissertations in the thesis management, and also provides new ideas and methods for optimizing its quality evaluation system.更多还原